Arbitral awards : grounds for review

Typically, one would presume that judicial review, in the context of arbitration, refers to the process for setting aside an arbitral award under s. 37 of the Malaysian Arbitration Act 2005 (‘Act’). We, however, follow a broader view based on the outcome of judicial scrutiny and substance, i.e. the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit
Format: Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Current Law Journal 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/82680/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/82680/1/82680_Arbitral%20awards%20-%20C33.pdf
_version_ 1848789347633987584
author Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit
author_facet Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit
author_sort Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
description Typically, one would presume that judicial review, in the context of arbitration, refers to the process for setting aside an arbitral award under s. 37 of the Malaysian Arbitration Act 2005 (‘Act’). We, however, follow a broader view based on the outcome of judicial scrutiny and substance, i.e. the power of the court whenever it is authorised under the Act to intervene or re-examine the validity of an arbitral award. This may be setting aside the award under s. 37 for domestic arbitration and the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under ss. 38-39.2 Naturally, we do not refer to the power of the court under ss. 10 and 11 of the Act or other sections that authorise court action prior to or during the process of arbitration.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T17:55:17Z
format Book Chapter
id iium-82680
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T17:55:17Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Current Law Journal
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling iium-826802021-01-18T07:28:36Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/82680/ Arbitral awards : grounds for review Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit K1001 Commercial Law K600 Private Law Typically, one would presume that judicial review, in the context of arbitration, refers to the process for setting aside an arbitral award under s. 37 of the Malaysian Arbitration Act 2005 (‘Act’). We, however, follow a broader view based on the outcome of judicial scrutiny and substance, i.e. the power of the court whenever it is authorised under the Act to intervene or re-examine the validity of an arbitral award. This may be setting aside the award under s. 37 for domestic arbitration and the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under ss. 38-39.2 Naturally, we do not refer to the power of the court under ss. 10 and 11 of the Act or other sections that authorise court action prior to or during the process of arbitration. Current Law Journal 2020-01 Book Chapter PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/82680/1/82680_Arbitral%20awards%20-%20C33.pdf Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit (2020) Arbitral awards : grounds for review. In: Alternative dispute resolution: law & practice. Current Law Journal, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 655-690. ISBN 978-967-457-144-3 https://www.cljlaw.com/store/product/alternative-dispute-resolution-law-practice/
spellingShingle K1001 Commercial Law
K600 Private Law
Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit
Arbitral awards : grounds for review
title Arbitral awards : grounds for review
title_full Arbitral awards : grounds for review
title_fullStr Arbitral awards : grounds for review
title_full_unstemmed Arbitral awards : grounds for review
title_short Arbitral awards : grounds for review
title_sort arbitral awards : grounds for review
topic K1001 Commercial Law
K600 Private Law
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/82680/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/82680/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/82680/1/82680_Arbitral%20awards%20-%20C33.pdf