Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom?

The establishment of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims (hereinafter referred to as “the TCC”) in 1999 may be considered as a major landmark in the development of consumer protection law in Malaysia. The TCC has received considerably good response from the public and the number of claims filed by cons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amin, Naemah
Format: Proceeding Paper
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/6578/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/6578/1/JUDICIAL_REVIEW_OF_THE_TRIBUNAL_FOR_CONSUMER_CLAIMS.pdf
_version_ 1848776692901871616
author Amin, Naemah
author_facet Amin, Naemah
author_sort Amin, Naemah
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
description The establishment of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims (hereinafter referred to as “the TCC”) in 1999 may be considered as a major landmark in the development of consumer protection law in Malaysia. The TCC has received considerably good response from the public and the number of claims filed by consumers has risen substantially over the years. Nevertheless, in the course of offering an informal, faster and cheaper procedure to consumers, the TCC has to face with few challenges and one of the major challenges is judicial review. Just like other inferior courts or quasi-judicial bodies, the awards of the TCC may be subject to judicial review on questions of law. This procedure has been used by traders who are backed by huge financial resources and legal experts to challenge the Tribunal’s findings. On the other hand consumers who are dragged into the process may not be able to defend themselves without assistance from lawyers or consumer associations. For the same reason judicial review will not be used by consumers although there are instances where the Tribunal's awards were not in their favour. This paper aims to examine the judicial review of the TCC’s awards and its impact on consumers and the TCC’s reputation as an effective consumer redress mechanism.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T14:34:08Z
format Proceeding Paper
id iium-6578
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T14:34:08Z
publishDate 2011
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling iium-65782011-12-09T10:12:33Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/6578/ Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom? Amin, Naemah K Law (General) KPG Malaysia The establishment of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims (hereinafter referred to as “the TCC”) in 1999 may be considered as a major landmark in the development of consumer protection law in Malaysia. The TCC has received considerably good response from the public and the number of claims filed by consumers has risen substantially over the years. Nevertheless, in the course of offering an informal, faster and cheaper procedure to consumers, the TCC has to face with few challenges and one of the major challenges is judicial review. Just like other inferior courts or quasi-judicial bodies, the awards of the TCC may be subject to judicial review on questions of law. This procedure has been used by traders who are backed by huge financial resources and legal experts to challenge the Tribunal’s findings. On the other hand consumers who are dragged into the process may not be able to defend themselves without assistance from lawyers or consumer associations. For the same reason judicial review will not be used by consumers although there are instances where the Tribunal's awards were not in their favour. This paper aims to examine the judicial review of the TCC’s awards and its impact on consumers and the TCC’s reputation as an effective consumer redress mechanism. 2011-09-21 Proceeding Paper PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/6578/1/JUDICIAL_REVIEW_OF_THE_TRIBUNAL_FOR_CONSUMER_CLAIMS.pdf Amin, Naemah (2011) Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom? In: International Conference on Consumer Law 2011, 21 September 2011, Equatorial Hotel, Bangi. (Unpublished)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
Amin, Naemah
Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom?
title Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom?
title_full Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom?
title_fullStr Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom?
title_full_unstemmed Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom?
title_short Judicial review of the Tribunal for Consumer Claims' awards: a justice for whom?
title_sort judicial review of the tribunal for consumer claims' awards: a justice for whom?
topic K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/6578/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/6578/1/JUDICIAL_REVIEW_OF_THE_TRIBUNAL_FOR_CONSUMER_CLAIMS.pdf