The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population
Background: AIMS65 is a score designed to predict in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs of gastrointestinal bleeding. Objectives: Our aims were to evaluate the performance of the AIMS65 compared with Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) in predicting in-patient mortality, and the secondary o...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Monograph |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/1/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/2/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc |
| _version_ | 1848785152105250816 |
|---|---|
| author | Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish |
| author_facet | Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish |
| author_sort | Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri |
| building | IIUM Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Background: AIMS65 is a score designed to predict in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Objectives: Our aims were to evaluate the performance of the AIMS65 compared with Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) in predicting in-patient mortality, and the secondary outcomes include composite clinical endpoint of intensive care unit (ICU) admission; timing of endoscopy; re-endoscopy; blood transfusion and length of hospital stay.
Methodology: The study was successful in recruiting 103 patients. Clinical and biochemical data, transfusion requirements, endoscopic treatment and its timing, and outcomes for 3 months after admission were collected. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital, re-endoscopy, blood transfusions, and length of stay.
Findings: In receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses, AIMS65 was significantly better in predicting inpatient mortality compared with GBS (0.196 vs 0.464). In fact, AIMS65 showed a statistically significant association with mortality for patients with AUGIB (P=0.012). AIMS65 and GBS were identical in predicting ICU (0.600 vs 0.533), timing of endoscopy (0.428 vs 0.458), re-endoscopy (0.407 vs 0.537), blood transfusion (0.694 vs 0.667) and length of hospital stay (0.600 vs 0.350).
Conclusion: AIMS65 is a better score predicting mortality compared with GBS. AIMS65 is comparable to GBS in essential endpoints such as the need for ICU admission, timing of endoscopy, re-endoscopic intervention, blood transfusion and length of hospital stay. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T16:48:36Z |
| format | Monograph |
| id | iium-58630 |
| institution | International Islamic University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T16:48:36Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | iium-586302018-02-03T09:05:17Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/ The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine Background: AIMS65 is a score designed to predict in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs of gastrointestinal bleeding. Objectives: Our aims were to evaluate the performance of the AIMS65 compared with Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) in predicting in-patient mortality, and the secondary outcomes include composite clinical endpoint of intensive care unit (ICU) admission; timing of endoscopy; re-endoscopy; blood transfusion and length of hospital stay. Methodology: The study was successful in recruiting 103 patients. Clinical and biochemical data, transfusion requirements, endoscopic treatment and its timing, and outcomes for 3 months after admission were collected. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital, re-endoscopy, blood transfusions, and length of stay. Findings: In receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses, AIMS65 was significantly better in predicting inpatient mortality compared with GBS (0.196 vs 0.464). In fact, AIMS65 showed a statistically significant association with mortality for patients with AUGIB (P=0.012). AIMS65 and GBS were identical in predicting ICU (0.600 vs 0.533), timing of endoscopy (0.428 vs 0.458), re-endoscopy (0.407 vs 0.537), blood transfusion (0.694 vs 0.667) and length of hospital stay (0.600 vs 0.350). Conclusion: AIMS65 is a better score predicting mortality compared with GBS. AIMS65 is comparable to GBS in essential endpoints such as the need for ICU admission, timing of endoscopy, re-endoscopic intervention, blood transfusion and length of hospital stay. 2017-08 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/1/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/2/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri and Jaafar, Khairul Azhar and Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish (2017) The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population. Research Report. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished) |
| spellingShingle | R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population |
| title | The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population |
| title_full | The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population |
| title_fullStr | The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population |
| title_full_unstemmed | The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population |
| title_short | The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population |
| title_sort | comparison between glasgow blatchford score and aims65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for asian population |
| topic | R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine |
| url | http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/1/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/2/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc |