Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future
This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
LexisNexis
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/7/52653-new.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848784096538394624 |
|---|---|
| author | Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali |
| author_facet | Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali |
| author_sort | Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali |
| building | IIUM Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or position is discussed with reference to the New Zealand Court of Appeal's decision in Brighouse Ltd v Bilderbeck. The minority decision in Brighouse Ltd's case was followed in Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin, a decision of the Court of Appeal comprising a panel of seven judges. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T16:31:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | iium-52653 |
| institution | International Islamic University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T16:31:49Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | LexisNexis |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | iium-526532016-11-23T07:51:22Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/ Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali K Law (General) This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or position is discussed with reference to the New Zealand Court of Appeal's decision in Brighouse Ltd v Bilderbeck. The minority decision in Brighouse Ltd's case was followed in Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin, a decision of the Court of Appeal comprising a panel of seven judges. LexisNexis 2016-07 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/7/52653-new.pdf Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali (2016) Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future. Malayan Law Journal, 2016 (4 (July-August)). lxxiii-lxxxiii. ISSN 0025-1283 |
| spellingShingle | K Law (General) Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title | Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_full | Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_fullStr | Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_short | Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_sort | dissenting opinion: the voice of the future |
| topic | K Law (General) |
| url | http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/7/52653-new.pdf |