A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
In the twenty first century the term ‘sustainability’ is recognized unanimously as an inherent and important strategy for an organization to operate and achieve long-term competitive edge. Accordingly sustainable key performance indicators (KPI) are identified by manufacturers and introduced for ado...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN)
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/3/arpn_comparative_evaluation.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/6/47063_A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20prevailing%20models_SCOPUS.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848783077792284672 |
|---|---|
| author | Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul |
| author_facet | Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul |
| author_sort | Khalili, Amjad |
| building | IIUM Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | In the twenty first century the term ‘sustainability’ is recognized unanimously as an inherent and important strategy for an organization to operate and achieve long-term competitive edge. Accordingly sustainable key performance indicators (KPI) are identified by manufacturers and introduced for adoption and application in different operational activities. However, the dimensions of the sustainability models adopted by different enterprises are quite diverse as revealed through this investigation. The organizations are found to focus on varieties of strategic aspects rather than adopting identical or uniform strategies when dealing with sustainability issues. This paper aims at reviewing the various models prevailing in the contemporary research papers along with presentation of an in-depth analysis exposing the similar and dissimilar aspects. The contribution of this review is twofold: various models for sustainable performance (SP) are critically analyzed followed by a comparative evaluation with a view to proposing a general model suitable for adoption by manufacturing enterprises. The unified model as proposed in this paper comprises of three major components related to the social, financial and environmental domains. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T16:15:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | iium-47063 |
| institution | International Islamic University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T16:15:37Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN) |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | iium-470632017-03-17T07:18:25Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul T55.4 Industrial engineering.Management engineering. In the twenty first century the term ‘sustainability’ is recognized unanimously as an inherent and important strategy for an organization to operate and achieve long-term competitive edge. Accordingly sustainable key performance indicators (KPI) are identified by manufacturers and introduced for adoption and application in different operational activities. However, the dimensions of the sustainability models adopted by different enterprises are quite diverse as revealed through this investigation. The organizations are found to focus on varieties of strategic aspects rather than adopting identical or uniform strategies when dealing with sustainability issues. This paper aims at reviewing the various models prevailing in the contemporary research papers along with presentation of an in-depth analysis exposing the similar and dissimilar aspects. The contribution of this review is twofold: various models for sustainable performance (SP) are critically analyzed followed by a comparative evaluation with a view to proposing a general model suitable for adoption by manufacturing enterprises. The unified model as proposed in this paper comprises of three major components related to the social, financial and environmental domains. Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN) 2016-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/3/arpn_comparative_evaluation.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/6/47063_A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20prevailing%20models_SCOPUS.pdf Khalili, Amjad and Ismail, Md Yusof and Karim, A.N. Mustafizul (2016) A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11 (1). pp. 292-296. ISSN 1819-6608 http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2016/jeas_0116_3334.pdf |
| spellingShingle | T55.4 Industrial engineering.Management engineering. Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance |
| title | A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance |
| title_full | A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance |
| title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance |
| title_short | A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance |
| topic | T55.4 Industrial engineering.Management engineering. |
| url | http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/3/arpn_comparative_evaluation.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/6/47063_A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20prevailing%20models_SCOPUS.pdf |