A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor

We formulated the problem of a capacitive pressure microsensor using linear plate model. Then, we solved the problem using two approaches; the first is analytical approach and the second is a reduced-order model using four-term Galerkin approximation employing polynomial expansion. We found that the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faris, Waleed Fekry, Mohammed, Hazem
Format: Proceeding Paper
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/30772/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/30772/1/A_comparison_between_two.pdf
_version_ 1848780340868415488
author Faris, Waleed Fekry
Mohammed, Hazem
author_facet Faris, Waleed Fekry
Mohammed, Hazem
author_sort Faris, Waleed Fekry
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
description We formulated the problem of a capacitive pressure microsensor using linear plate model. Then, we solved the problem using two approaches; the first is analytical approach and the second is a reduced-order model using four-term Galerkin approximation employing polynomial expansion. We found that the pull-in value of the capacitance vary widely between the two approaches almost 40 percent increase in the second method. Also, central deflection at which the pull-in takes place is different between the two methods
first_indexed 2025-11-14T15:32:07Z
format Proceeding Paper
id iium-30772
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T15:32:07Z
publishDate 2004
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling iium-307722013-09-19T08:14:55Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/30772/ A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor Faris, Waleed Fekry Mohammed, Hazem TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery We formulated the problem of a capacitive pressure microsensor using linear plate model. Then, we solved the problem using two approaches; the first is analytical approach and the second is a reduced-order model using four-term Galerkin approximation employing polynomial expansion. We found that the pull-in value of the capacitance vary widely between the two approaches almost 40 percent increase in the second method. Also, central deflection at which the pull-in takes place is different between the two methods 2004 Proceeding Paper PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/30772/1/A_comparison_between_two.pdf Faris, Waleed Fekry and Mohammed, Hazem (2004) A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, 7-9 December 2004, Kuala Lumpur. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1620891&queryText%3DA+comparison+between+two+solution+approaches+for+diaphragmbased+capacitive+pressure+microsensor
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Faris, Waleed Fekry
Mohammed, Hazem
A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor
title A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor
title_full A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor
title_fullStr A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor
title_short A comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor
title_sort comparison between two solution approaches for diaphragm-based capacitive pressure microsensor
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/30772/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/30772/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/30772/1/A_comparison_between_two.pdf