Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research

The paper is based on a study that compares data collected from two methods, namely, individuals acting as respondents and individuals acting as informants. The former involves self-rating while the later asks individuals to rate other’s beliefs, preferences, and actions. The study objective was to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Singh, RBN, Hassan, Arif
Format: Proceeding Paper
Language:English
English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/1/Draft_Melbourne_2012_Program.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/2/19_IBR_Conf_Paper.pdf
_version_ 1848779827216121856
author Singh, RBN
Hassan, Arif
author_facet Singh, RBN
Hassan, Arif
author_sort Singh, RBN
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
description The paper is based on a study that compares data collected from two methods, namely, individuals acting as respondents and individuals acting as informants. The former involves self-rating while the later asks individuals to rate other’s beliefs, preferences, and actions. The study objective was to examine the role of social desirability factor in self-rating method of data collection. Good number of business and management studies uses self-rating questionnaires and interviews which may not yield data that truly reflect the reality due to respondents’ tendency to present himself/herself in a socially desirable manner. This may be even more pronounced in a collectivistic culture where individual’s thoughts and perception are deeply influenced by the social norms and values. No such study has been conducted that compares the two method of data collection in a single study, providing the justification for this research. A sample of 100 adults of mix background from India and 127 students from Malaysia rated predominantly positive and negative description of beliefs, values and preferences twice--first for the people residing around them and then for themselves. They also rated themselves on a scale of social desirability. The findings confirmed that the respondents attributed negative cognitions (beliefs, values and preferences) to the people more than themselves. They attributed predominantly positive beliefs, values and preferences to themselves and people, although a shade more to themselves. The social desirability orientation was meaningfully related to respondents’ self but not to people’s related perceptions. The findings thus favored the use of respondents in informants’ role of judging people’s cognitions of social reality.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T15:23:57Z
format Proceeding Paper
id iium-27495
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T15:23:57Z
publishDate 2012
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling iium-274952012-12-31T07:50:41Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/ Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research Singh, RBN Hassan, Arif HA29 Theory and method of social science statistics The paper is based on a study that compares data collected from two methods, namely, individuals acting as respondents and individuals acting as informants. The former involves self-rating while the later asks individuals to rate other’s beliefs, preferences, and actions. The study objective was to examine the role of social desirability factor in self-rating method of data collection. Good number of business and management studies uses self-rating questionnaires and interviews which may not yield data that truly reflect the reality due to respondents’ tendency to present himself/herself in a socially desirable manner. This may be even more pronounced in a collectivistic culture where individual’s thoughts and perception are deeply influenced by the social norms and values. No such study has been conducted that compares the two method of data collection in a single study, providing the justification for this research. A sample of 100 adults of mix background from India and 127 students from Malaysia rated predominantly positive and negative description of beliefs, values and preferences twice--first for the people residing around them and then for themselves. They also rated themselves on a scale of social desirability. The findings confirmed that the respondents attributed negative cognitions (beliefs, values and preferences) to the people more than themselves. They attributed predominantly positive beliefs, values and preferences to themselves and people, although a shade more to themselves. The social desirability orientation was meaningfully related to respondents’ self but not to people’s related perceptions. The findings thus favored the use of respondents in informants’ role of judging people’s cognitions of social reality. 2012 Proceeding Paper PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/1/Draft_Melbourne_2012_Program.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/2/19_IBR_Conf_Paper.pdf Singh, RBN and Hassan, Arif (2012) Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research. In: 19 International Business Research Conference, 19-21, November 2012, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. (Unpublished)
spellingShingle HA29 Theory and method of social science statistics
Singh, RBN
Hassan, Arif
Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research
title Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research
title_full Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research
title_fullStr Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research
title_full_unstemmed Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research
title_short Respondents versus Informants Methods of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research
title_sort respondents versus informants methods of data collection: implications for business research
topic HA29 Theory and method of social science statistics
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/1/Draft_Melbourne_2012_Program.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27495/2/19_IBR_Conf_Paper.pdf