Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics

James Rachels’s distinction between killing and letting die maintains that there is morally no difference between killing a terminally ill patient and letting him/her die. Therefore, active and passive euthanasia dichotomy is a distinction without a difference. Hence, if passive euthanasia is allowe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malik, Mohammad Manzoor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IIUM Press 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/17282/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/17282/1/Killing_and_Letting_Die_An_Irrelevant_Distinction_to_Bioethics.pdf
_version_ 1848778018857680896
author Malik, Mohammad Manzoor
author_facet Malik, Mohammad Manzoor
author_sort Malik, Mohammad Manzoor
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
description James Rachels’s distinction between killing and letting die maintains that there is morally no difference between killing a terminally ill patient and letting him/her die. Therefore, active and passive euthanasia dichotomy is a distinction without a difference. Hence, if passive euthanasia is allowed, active euthanasia should be permitted too. The paper demonstrated that the distinction between killing and letting die is: (1) irrelevant to euthanasia(2) extraneous to the medical profession, and (3) methodologically degressive. Furthermore, the paper demonstrated invalidity of the bare difference argument of Rachels based on the distinction because of four reasons: (1) irrelevance to American Medical Association’s statement; (2) differences between the cases such as intentionality, causality, and agency; (3) straw man fallacy, (4) and weak analogy. Therefore, the paper concluded that relating the distinction between killings and letting die to bioethics and euthanasia is unjustifiable.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T14:55:13Z
format Article
id iium-17282
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T14:55:13Z
publishDate 2011
publisher IIUM Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling iium-172822012-01-30T00:56:50Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/17282/ Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics Malik, Mohammad Manzoor BJ1725 Ethics of social groups, classes, etc. Professional ethics RA1001 Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine James Rachels’s distinction between killing and letting die maintains that there is morally no difference between killing a terminally ill patient and letting him/her die. Therefore, active and passive euthanasia dichotomy is a distinction without a difference. Hence, if passive euthanasia is allowed, active euthanasia should be permitted too. The paper demonstrated that the distinction between killing and letting die is: (1) irrelevant to euthanasia(2) extraneous to the medical profession, and (3) methodologically degressive. Furthermore, the paper demonstrated invalidity of the bare difference argument of Rachels based on the distinction because of four reasons: (1) irrelevance to American Medical Association’s statement; (2) differences between the cases such as intentionality, causality, and agency; (3) straw man fallacy, (4) and weak analogy. Therefore, the paper concluded that relating the distinction between killings and letting die to bioethics and euthanasia is unjustifiable. IIUM Press 2011-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/17282/1/Killing_and_Letting_Die_An_Irrelevant_Distinction_to_Bioethics.pdf Malik, Mohammad Manzoor (2011) Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics. Journal of Islam in Asia, S.Iss (4). pp. 383-396. ISSN 1823-0970 (In Press) http://www.iium.edu.my/jiasia/ojs-2.2/index.php/Islam
spellingShingle BJ1725 Ethics of social groups, classes, etc. Professional ethics
RA1001 Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine
Malik, Mohammad Manzoor
Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics
title Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics
title_full Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics
title_fullStr Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics
title_full_unstemmed Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics
title_short Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics
title_sort killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics
topic BJ1725 Ethics of social groups, classes, etc. Professional ethics
RA1001 Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/17282/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/17282/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/17282/1/Killing_and_Letting_Die_An_Irrelevant_Distinction_to_Bioethics.pdf