Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens through contact with human blood and other body fluids. This study was conducted to estimate the global and regional 1-year prevalence of percutaneous injuries (PCIs) among HCWs. Methods: We systematic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Auta, A., Adewuyi, Emmanuel, Tor-Anyiin, A., Edor, J.P., Kureh, G.T., Khanal, V., Oga, E., Adeloye, D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97791
_version_ 1848766317071433728
author Auta, A.
Adewuyi, Emmanuel
Tor-Anyiin, A.
Edor, J.P.
Kureh, G.T.
Khanal, V.
Oga, E.
Adeloye, D.
author_facet Auta, A.
Adewuyi, Emmanuel
Tor-Anyiin, A.
Edor, J.P.
Kureh, G.T.
Khanal, V.
Oga, E.
Adeloye, D.
author_sort Auta, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens through contact with human blood and other body fluids. This study was conducted to estimate the global and regional 1-year prevalence of percutaneous injuries (PCIs) among HCWs. Methods: We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and PsychInfo databases for studies published from January 2008 to January 2018 that reported the prevalence of PCIs among HCWs. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of PCIs among HCWs. Results: Of the 5205 articles identified, 148 studies from 43 countries met the inclusion criteria. The pooled global 1-year prevalence estimate of PCIs was 36.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.9–40.0]. There were substantial regional variations in the 1-year prevalence of PCIs, ranging from 7.7% (95% CI: 3.1–12.4) in South America to 43.2% (95% CI: 38.3–48.0) in Asia. The estimates for Africa and Europe were comparable with values of 34.5% (95% CI: 29.9–39.1) and 31.8% (95% CI: 25.0–38.5), respectively. The highest 1-year prevalence by job category was among surgeons, at 72.6% (95% CI: 58.0–87.2). The estimates for medical doctors (excluding surgeons), nurses (including midwives) and laboratory staff (including laboratory technicians) were 44.5% (95% CI: 37.5–51.5), 40.9% (95% CI: 35.2–46.7) and 32.4% (95% CI: 20.9–49.3), respectively. PCIs commonly occurred among HCWs working in hospital (41.8%, 95% CI: 37.6–46.0) than non-hospital (7.5%, 95% CI: 5.9–9.1) settings. Conclusions: Our findings suggest high rates of PCIs among HCWs with direct patient care across many regions of the world. However, paucity of data from some countries was a major limitation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:49:13Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-97791
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language eng
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:49:13Z
publishDate 2018
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-977912025-05-22T15:35:36Z Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis Auta, A. Adewuyi, Emmanuel Tor-Anyiin, A. Edor, J.P. Kureh, G.T. Khanal, V. Oga, E. Adeloye, D. Africa Asia Europe Hospitals Humans Needlestick Injuries Occupational Injuries Personnel, Hospital Prevalence Risk Management Skin Skin Humans Needlestick Injuries Prevalence Personnel, Hospital Hospitals Risk Management Africa Asia Europe Occupational Injuries Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens through contact with human blood and other body fluids. This study was conducted to estimate the global and regional 1-year prevalence of percutaneous injuries (PCIs) among HCWs. Methods: We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and PsychInfo databases for studies published from January 2008 to January 2018 that reported the prevalence of PCIs among HCWs. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of PCIs among HCWs. Results: Of the 5205 articles identified, 148 studies from 43 countries met the inclusion criteria. The pooled global 1-year prevalence estimate of PCIs was 36.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.9–40.0]. There were substantial regional variations in the 1-year prevalence of PCIs, ranging from 7.7% (95% CI: 3.1–12.4) in South America to 43.2% (95% CI: 38.3–48.0) in Asia. The estimates for Africa and Europe were comparable with values of 34.5% (95% CI: 29.9–39.1) and 31.8% (95% CI: 25.0–38.5), respectively. The highest 1-year prevalence by job category was among surgeons, at 72.6% (95% CI: 58.0–87.2). The estimates for medical doctors (excluding surgeons), nurses (including midwives) and laboratory staff (including laboratory technicians) were 44.5% (95% CI: 37.5–51.5), 40.9% (95% CI: 35.2–46.7) and 32.4% (95% CI: 20.9–49.3), respectively. PCIs commonly occurred among HCWs working in hospital (41.8%, 95% CI: 37.6–46.0) than non-hospital (7.5%, 95% CI: 5.9–9.1) settings. Conclusions: Our findings suggest high rates of PCIs among HCWs with direct patient care across many regions of the world. However, paucity of data from some countries was a major limitation. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97791 10.1093/ije/dyy208 eng unknown
spellingShingle Africa
Asia
Europe
Hospitals
Humans
Needlestick Injuries
Occupational Injuries
Personnel, Hospital
Prevalence
Risk Management
Skin
Skin
Humans
Needlestick Injuries
Prevalence
Personnel, Hospital
Hospitals
Risk Management
Africa
Asia
Europe
Occupational Injuries
Auta, A.
Adewuyi, Emmanuel
Tor-Anyiin, A.
Edor, J.P.
Kureh, G.T.
Khanal, V.
Oga, E.
Adeloye, D.
Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Africa
Asia
Europe
Hospitals
Humans
Needlestick Injuries
Occupational Injuries
Personnel, Hospital
Prevalence
Risk Management
Skin
Skin
Humans
Needlestick Injuries
Prevalence
Personnel, Hospital
Hospitals
Risk Management
Africa
Asia
Europe
Occupational Injuries
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97791