Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics

Floating photovoltaics (FPV) offer benefits in land conservation, evaporation prevention and mitigation of PV panel thermal degradation. Previous studies suggested that enhanced cooling in FPV contributes to the improved efficiency of the PV panel compared to land-based PV (LPV) systems. However, mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramanan, C.J., Lim, King Hann, Kurnia, Jundika
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2025
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97433
_version_ 1848766265279119360
author Ramanan, C.J.
Lim, King Hann
Kurnia, Jundika
author_facet Ramanan, C.J.
Lim, King Hann
Kurnia, Jundika
author_sort Ramanan, C.J.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Floating photovoltaics (FPV) offer benefits in land conservation, evaporation prevention and mitigation of PV panel thermal degradation. Previous studies suggested that enhanced cooling in FPV contributes to the improved efficiency of the PV panel compared to land-based PV (LPV) systems. However, most reported studies have constraints such as ex-situ measurements, manual data collection, data averaging, numerical analysis limitations, and limited comparison between FPV and LPV designs. These limitations hinder the accurate prediction of FPV's superior performance due to cooling mechanisms. Hence, this study investigates the performance evaluation of LPV and FPV systems in terms of 250 mm height FPV, 800 mm height FPV and 800 mm height LPV for a total measurement duration of six days. This investigation takes into account the effect of dynamic environmental parameters, including solar radiation, ambient and water temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, and rainfall. Results reveal that the temperature of the FPV at 250 mm height reduces by more than 2 ∘C compared to the LPV at 800 mm height. It should be noted that this improvement was recorded during off-time when solar radiation is not optimal for energy generation. Meanwhile, the 800 mm height FPV demonstrates cooling at a range of 2 ∘C to 0 ∘C compared to 800 mm height LPV for 57 % of the experiment duration in time and makes it the best cooling performer. Furthermore, humidity, rainfall, fluctuating solar radiation, high wind speed and higher differences in water and ambient temperature were found to significantly contribute to FPV cooling. The resulting findings can be used to improve the accuracy of FPV performance prediction and thus contribute to the advancements of green energy technology.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:48:24Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-97433
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:48:24Z
publishDate 2025
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-974332025-04-16T01:31:19Z Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics Ramanan, C.J. Lim, King Hann Kurnia, Jundika Floating photovoltaics (FPV) offer benefits in land conservation, evaporation prevention and mitigation of PV panel thermal degradation. Previous studies suggested that enhanced cooling in FPV contributes to the improved efficiency of the PV panel compared to land-based PV (LPV) systems. However, most reported studies have constraints such as ex-situ measurements, manual data collection, data averaging, numerical analysis limitations, and limited comparison between FPV and LPV designs. These limitations hinder the accurate prediction of FPV's superior performance due to cooling mechanisms. Hence, this study investigates the performance evaluation of LPV and FPV systems in terms of 250 mm height FPV, 800 mm height FPV and 800 mm height LPV for a total measurement duration of six days. This investigation takes into account the effect of dynamic environmental parameters, including solar radiation, ambient and water temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, and rainfall. Results reveal that the temperature of the FPV at 250 mm height reduces by more than 2 ∘C compared to the LPV at 800 mm height. It should be noted that this improvement was recorded during off-time when solar radiation is not optimal for energy generation. Meanwhile, the 800 mm height FPV demonstrates cooling at a range of 2 ∘C to 0 ∘C compared to 800 mm height LPV for 57 % of the experiment duration in time and makes it the best cooling performer. Furthermore, humidity, rainfall, fluctuating solar radiation, high wind speed and higher differences in water and ambient temperature were found to significantly contribute to FPV cooling. The resulting findings can be used to improve the accuracy of FPV performance prediction and thus contribute to the advancements of green energy technology. 2025 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97433 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125642 unknown
spellingShingle Ramanan, C.J.
Lim, King Hann
Kurnia, Jundika
Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics
title Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics
title_full Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics
title_fullStr Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics
title_full_unstemmed Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics
title_short Thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: A comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics
title_sort thermal behavior of floating photovoltaics: a comparison of performance at varying heights and benchmarking against land-based photovoltaics
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97433