Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations

Our research examines the differential effects of stereotypically feminine work behavior—team member adaptivity—on performance evaluations. Team member adaptivity requires being accommodating to changing relational and situational demands to achieve interdependent work goals. As such, women who enga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carpini, J.A., Luksyte, Aleksandra, Parker, Sharon, Collins, C.G.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2023
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97307
_version_ 1848766250846519296
author Carpini, J.A.
Luksyte, Aleksandra
Parker, Sharon
Collins, C.G.
author_facet Carpini, J.A.
Luksyte, Aleksandra
Parker, Sharon
Collins, C.G.
author_sort Carpini, J.A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Our research examines the differential effects of stereotypically feminine work behavior—team member adaptivity—on performance evaluations. Team member adaptivity requires being accommodating to changing relational and situational demands to achieve interdependent work goals. As such, women who engage in team member adaptivity will be recognized and rewarded more in their performance evaluations compared to men. We tested our model across three studies. As hypothesized, the results of Experimental Study 1 (N = 600) demonstrated team member adaptivity is subject to a gendered stereotype and ascribed to women more so than to men. Building on this finding, Field Study 2 (N = 96) demonstrated that team member adaptivity was positively related to performance evaluations for women but not for men. Study 3 used multi-source dyadic data obtained from managers and their supervisors (N = 141) and demonstrated that women who engage in team member adaptivity receive more favorable performance evaluations than their male counterparts. Together, these studies demonstrated the benefits of team member adaptivity for women more so than for men. This research extends our understanding of social role theory as well as the outcomes of adaptive performance while also offering several avenues for future scholarship with the potential to address ongoing gender inequities in the workplace.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:48:10Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-97307
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:48:10Z
publishDate 2023
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-973072025-05-20T00:48:20Z Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations Carpini, J.A. Luksyte, Aleksandra Parker, Sharon Collins, C.G. Our research examines the differential effects of stereotypically feminine work behavior—team member adaptivity—on performance evaluations. Team member adaptivity requires being accommodating to changing relational and situational demands to achieve interdependent work goals. As such, women who engage in team member adaptivity will be recognized and rewarded more in their performance evaluations compared to men. We tested our model across three studies. As hypothesized, the results of Experimental Study 1 (N = 600) demonstrated team member adaptivity is subject to a gendered stereotype and ascribed to women more so than to men. Building on this finding, Field Study 2 (N = 96) demonstrated that team member adaptivity was positively related to performance evaluations for women but not for men. Study 3 used multi-source dyadic data obtained from managers and their supervisors (N = 141) and demonstrated that women who engage in team member adaptivity receive more favorable performance evaluations than their male counterparts. Together, these studies demonstrated the benefits of team member adaptivity for women more so than for men. This research extends our understanding of social role theory as well as the outcomes of adaptive performance while also offering several avenues for future scholarship with the potential to address ongoing gender inequities in the workplace. 2023 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97307 10.1002/job.2702 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ fulltext
spellingShingle Carpini, J.A.
Luksyte, Aleksandra
Parker, Sharon
Collins, C.G.
Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations
title Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations
title_full Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations
title_fullStr Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations
title_short Can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? Evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations
title_sort can a familiar gender stereotype create a not-so-familiar benefit for women? evidence of gendered differences in ascribed stereotypes and effects of team member adaptivity on performance evaluations
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97307