Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices

Policies encouraging extended workforce participation mainly focus on financial motives, but socioemotional selectivity theory and research suggest that mature worker motives are multifaceted, with emotionally meaningful goals gaining importance with age. We adopt a person-centred approach using lat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loh, V., Hamilton, M., Baird, M., Zettna, N., Constantin, A., Andrei, Daniela, Petery, G.A., Parker, Sharon
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2024
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE170100005
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97302
_version_ 1848766249407873024
author Loh, V.
Hamilton, M.
Baird, M.
Zettna, N.
Constantin, A.
Andrei, Daniela
Petery, G.A.
Parker, Sharon
author_facet Loh, V.
Hamilton, M.
Baird, M.
Zettna, N.
Constantin, A.
Andrei, Daniela
Petery, G.A.
Parker, Sharon
author_sort Loh, V.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Policies encouraging extended workforce participation mainly focus on financial motives, but socioemotional selectivity theory and research suggest that mature worker motives are multifaceted, with emotionally meaningful goals gaining importance with age. We adopt a person-centred approach using latent class analysis of survey data from 1501 Australian workers aged 45 years and over. Two motivational profiles based on patterns of motives were identified, which we term income-dominant (income is the main reason) and socioemotional-income (socioemotional reasons are dominant, but income is important too). Contrary to expectations, we found no evidence of a socioemotional-dominant profile. This provides new theoretical insights, as it suggests that even though socioemotional reasons may increase in importance with age, financial reasons remain important to most mature workers, especially those who may view work as being transactional. Being female, older, and having higher socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR policies increase the odds of having a socioemotional-income rather than income-dominant profile. The socioemotional-income subgroup had lower turnover intentions and later desired retirement ages than the income-dominant subgroup, highlighting the potential for more socioemotionally focused policies and practices to encourage extended workforce participation. JEL Classification: J26, M12, M54
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:48:09Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-97302
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:48:09Z
publishDate 2024
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-973022025-05-20T00:53:03Z Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices Loh, V. Hamilton, M. Baird, M. Zettna, N. Constantin, A. Andrei, Daniela Petery, G.A. Parker, Sharon Policies encouraging extended workforce participation mainly focus on financial motives, but socioemotional selectivity theory and research suggest that mature worker motives are multifaceted, with emotionally meaningful goals gaining importance with age. We adopt a person-centred approach using latent class analysis of survey data from 1501 Australian workers aged 45 years and over. Two motivational profiles based on patterns of motives were identified, which we term income-dominant (income is the main reason) and socioemotional-income (socioemotional reasons are dominant, but income is important too). Contrary to expectations, we found no evidence of a socioemotional-dominant profile. This provides new theoretical insights, as it suggests that even though socioemotional reasons may increase in importance with age, financial reasons remain important to most mature workers, especially those who may view work as being transactional. Being female, older, and having higher socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR policies increase the odds of having a socioemotional-income rather than income-dominant profile. The socioemotional-income subgroup had lower turnover intentions and later desired retirement ages than the income-dominant subgroup, highlighting the potential for more socioemotionally focused policies and practices to encourage extended workforce participation. JEL Classification: J26, M12, M54 2024 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97302 10.1177/03128962231176322 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE170100005 restricted
spellingShingle Loh, V.
Hamilton, M.
Baird, M.
Zettna, N.
Constantin, A.
Andrei, Daniela
Petery, G.A.
Parker, Sharon
Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices
title Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices
title_full Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices
title_fullStr Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices
title_full_unstemmed Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices
title_short Money matters, but what else? Mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive HR practices
title_sort money matters, but what else? mature worker motives and the importance of gender, age, socioeconomic status and age-inclusive hr practices
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE170100005
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97302