How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department?

Children with non-accidental injuries have increased risk of future death. There is insufficient evidence for widespread physical abuse screening tool use in the Emergency Department (ED). This study assesses the utility of a physical abuse project that includes the implementation of a screening too...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Bockxmeer, John, Enzor, Lesley, Makate, Marshall, Robinson, Suzanne
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Emergency Medicine Australasia 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97041
_version_ 1848766217653846016
author van Bockxmeer, John
Enzor, Lesley
Makate, Marshall
Robinson, Suzanne
author_facet van Bockxmeer, John
Enzor, Lesley
Makate, Marshall
Robinson, Suzanne
author_sort van Bockxmeer, John
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Children with non-accidental injuries have increased risk of future death. There is insufficient evidence for widespread physical abuse screening tool use in the Emergency Department (ED). This study assesses the utility of a physical abuse project that includes the implementation of a screening tool with case-matching from multiple sources. It aims to confirm whether risk-screening in a medium-sized rural Australian ED is reliable and will improve outcomes. Method: 16-month ED retrospective pre/post-implementation study of all injury, burn or poisoning cases 16 years and under. Presentations with potential physical abuse were filtered by ICD10 codes and reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression models compared pre and post implementation cases. Analyses examined outcomes, trends and interrogated the screening tool which formed a Clinical Pathway Algorithm (CPA). Results: 1,469 presentations underwent investigation. 747 pre-implementation and 722 post, Pearson’s chi-square test showed statistically insignificant differences. If tool used, documentation improved (OR 7.73; 95% CI 4.91 to 12.18), child protection service (CPS) referrals increased (OR 5.50; 95% CI 1.82 to 16.61) and hospital admissions decreased (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.79). Re-presentation rates stayed the same. Increased physical abuse was associated with screening factors including carer behavioural concerns, inadequate supervision, delayed presentation, repeat and unexplained injuries (ORs/Cis in an accompanying figure). Screening tool sensitivity was 62.3%, specificity 79.7%. Conclusion: Implementing this ED paediatric physical abuse project improved safety behaviours and best-practice documentation. The tool improved medical decision making without increased representations. ED clinicians may use similar CPAs to help review safety concerns and facilitate discharge, however resources are needed to investigate referrals flagged due to false positive rates.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:47:38Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-97041
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language eng
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:47:38Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Emergency Medicine Australasia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-970412025-03-04T01:03:04Z How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department? van Bockxmeer, John Enzor, Lesley Makate, Marshall Robinson, Suzanne child protection child safety emergency department non‐accidental injury paediatric emergency medicine paediatric injury Humans Emergency Service, Hospital Female Male Child Child, Preschool Retrospective Studies Child Abuse Infant Mass Screening Adolescent Australia Physical Abuse Logistic Models Rural Population Humans Mass Screening Logistic Models Retrospective Studies Child Abuse Adolescent Child Child, Preschool Infant Rural Population Emergency Service, Hospital Australia Female Male Physical Abuse Children with non-accidental injuries have increased risk of future death. There is insufficient evidence for widespread physical abuse screening tool use in the Emergency Department (ED). This study assesses the utility of a physical abuse project that includes the implementation of a screening tool with case-matching from multiple sources. It aims to confirm whether risk-screening in a medium-sized rural Australian ED is reliable and will improve outcomes. Method: 16-month ED retrospective pre/post-implementation study of all injury, burn or poisoning cases 16 years and under. Presentations with potential physical abuse were filtered by ICD10 codes and reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression models compared pre and post implementation cases. Analyses examined outcomes, trends and interrogated the screening tool which formed a Clinical Pathway Algorithm (CPA). Results: 1,469 presentations underwent investigation. 747 pre-implementation and 722 post, Pearson’s chi-square test showed statistically insignificant differences. If tool used, documentation improved (OR 7.73; 95% CI 4.91 to 12.18), child protection service (CPS) referrals increased (OR 5.50; 95% CI 1.82 to 16.61) and hospital admissions decreased (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.79). Re-presentation rates stayed the same. Increased physical abuse was associated with screening factors including carer behavioural concerns, inadequate supervision, delayed presentation, repeat and unexplained injuries (ORs/Cis in an accompanying figure). Screening tool sensitivity was 62.3%, specificity 79.7%. Conclusion: Implementing this ED paediatric physical abuse project improved safety behaviours and best-practice documentation. The tool improved medical decision making without increased representations. ED clinicians may use similar CPAs to help review safety concerns and facilitate discharge, however resources are needed to investigate referrals flagged due to false positive rates. 2024 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97041 10.1111/1742-6723.70000 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Emergency Medicine Australasia fulltext
spellingShingle child protection
child safety
emergency department
non‐accidental injury
paediatric emergency medicine
paediatric injury
Humans
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Male
Child
Child, Preschool
Retrospective Studies
Child Abuse
Infant
Mass Screening
Adolescent
Australia
Physical Abuse
Logistic Models
Rural Population
Humans
Mass Screening
Logistic Models
Retrospective Studies
Child Abuse
Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Infant
Rural Population
Emergency Service, Hospital
Australia
Female
Male
Physical Abuse
van Bockxmeer, John
Enzor, Lesley
Makate, Marshall
Robinson, Suzanne
How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department?
title How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department?
title_full How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department?
title_fullStr How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department?
title_full_unstemmed How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department?
title_short How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian Emergency Department?
title_sort how useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural australian emergency department?
topic child protection
child safety
emergency department
non‐accidental injury
paediatric emergency medicine
paediatric injury
Humans
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Male
Child
Child, Preschool
Retrospective Studies
Child Abuse
Infant
Mass Screening
Adolescent
Australia
Physical Abuse
Logistic Models
Rural Population
Humans
Mass Screening
Logistic Models
Retrospective Studies
Child Abuse
Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Infant
Rural Population
Emergency Service, Hospital
Australia
Female
Male
Physical Abuse
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97041