EST(T): Should and Can Tax Performance be a Factor in Evaluating the Ethical, Moral and Social Performance of Corporations?
Advocates for greater social responsibility by corporations who support corporate social responsibility or environmental, social and governance standards accounting by large companies increasingly call for tax behaviour to be considered one indicator of desired social behaviour. This advocacy ma...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales
2024
|
| Online Access: | https://www.unsw.edu.au/content/dam/pdfs/business/acct-audit-tax/research-reports/ejournal-of-tax-research/2024-12-ejournal-tax-research-v22-n3/2024-12-eJTR-esgt-v22-n3.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/96584 |
| Summary: | Advocates for greater social responsibility by corporations who support corporate social responsibility or environmental, social
and governance standards accounting by large companies increasingly call for tax behaviour to be considered one indicator of
desired social behaviour. This advocacy may be based on naivety or a failure to understand the basis of tax avoidance by
multinational enterprises. The decision by developed nations to allocate profits of multinational enterprises on the basis of
notional arm’s length prices effectively endorses and invites companies to shift profits through transfer prices. Since the
transactions in question would almost never take place between unrelated companies in a genuine arm’s length environment,
there can be no comparable for developing an arm’s length price. As a result, the law effectively gives companies free rein to
nominate arm’s length prices that are inherently fictional given the absence of similar transactions outside multinational
enterprises. It can be argued, therefore, that it is both unfair and counterproductive to judge companies poorly because they
follow the law and accept the invitation inherent in the arm’s length system to shift profits and avoid tax. If social responsibility
advocates are concerned about tax avoidance by multinational enterprises, they should shift their attention from law-abiding
companies to the legislatures and press for replacement of the system for allocating international profits to one that attributes
profits to their actual sources based on objective indicators, not an allocation using fictional prices nominated by the companies
shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions. |
|---|