Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol

Introduction Partnership models that bring researchers, policymakers and service providers closer together are gaining traction as a strategy to improve public health practice. Yet, there is little evidence of how these models work, or indeed if they do work. The Sexual Health and Blood-borne Virus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobin, Rochelle, Hallett, Jonathan, Lobo, Roanna, Maycock, Bruce
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/96530
_version_ 1848766166099558400
author Tobin, Rochelle
Hallett, Jonathan
Lobo, Roanna
Maycock, Bruce
author_facet Tobin, Rochelle
Hallett, Jonathan
Lobo, Roanna
Maycock, Bruce
author_sort Tobin, Rochelle
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Introduction Partnership models that bring researchers, policymakers and service providers closer together are gaining traction as a strategy to improve public health practice. Yet, there is little evidence of how these models work, or indeed if they do work. The Sexual Health and Blood-borne Virus Applied Research and Evaluation Network (SiREN) is one such model. SiREN is a partnership between researchers, policymakers and service providers that aims to develop the research and evaluation capacity and evidence-informed decision making capability of professionals working to address sexual health and bloodborne virus issues in Western Australia. This study will use a systems approach to identify the mechanisms of action, impacts and outcomes of SiREN and inform the development of evaluation tools. Methods and analysis Data will be collected from organisational documents, surveys, in-depth interviews and a workshop. It will be analysed using a complex adaptive systems lens and findings will be used to inform the development of a type of qualitative systems model called a causal loop diagram. The causal loop diagram will illustrate the: contextual factors influencing engagement; mechanisms of action; and impacts and outcomes of SiREN. Evaluation tools will then be developed that can be used to assess the indicators identified in the causal loop diagram. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: HRE2017-0090). Participants will be free to withdraw from the study at any point and confidentiality will be maintained by de-identifying participant responses in any published or shared data. The findings from this study will be shared in conference presentations, reports, peer-reviewed journals and online through websites and social media.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:46:49Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-96530
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:46:49Z
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-965302025-01-16T05:27:44Z Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol Tobin, Rochelle Hallett, Jonathan Lobo, Roanna Maycock, Bruce Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine, General & Internal General & Internal Medicine Research capacity evaluation capacity partnerships public health causal loop diagram systems thinking PUBLIC-HEALTH THINKING MODEL DYNAMICS Research capacity causal loop diagram evaluation capacity partnerships public health systems thinking Australia Blood-Borne Pathogens Capacity Building Evaluation Studies as Topic Health Services Administration Humans Intersectoral Collaboration Policy Making Public Health Systems Research Research Design Sexual Health Systems Integration Virus Diseases Humans Blood-Borne Pathogens Virus Diseases Health Services Administration Research Design Systems Integration Policy Making Australia Evaluation Studies as Topic Capacity Building Intersectoral Collaboration Public Health Systems Research Sexual Health Introduction Partnership models that bring researchers, policymakers and service providers closer together are gaining traction as a strategy to improve public health practice. Yet, there is little evidence of how these models work, or indeed if they do work. The Sexual Health and Blood-borne Virus Applied Research and Evaluation Network (SiREN) is one such model. SiREN is a partnership between researchers, policymakers and service providers that aims to develop the research and evaluation capacity and evidence-informed decision making capability of professionals working to address sexual health and bloodborne virus issues in Western Australia. This study will use a systems approach to identify the mechanisms of action, impacts and outcomes of SiREN and inform the development of evaluation tools. Methods and analysis Data will be collected from organisational documents, surveys, in-depth interviews and a workshop. It will be analysed using a complex adaptive systems lens and findings will be used to inform the development of a type of qualitative systems model called a causal loop diagram. The causal loop diagram will illustrate the: contextual factors influencing engagement; mechanisms of action; and impacts and outcomes of SiREN. Evaluation tools will then be developed that can be used to assess the indicators identified in the causal loop diagram. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: HRE2017-0090). Participants will be free to withdraw from the study at any point and confidentiality will be maintained by de-identifying participant responses in any published or shared data. The findings from this study will be shared in conference presentations, reports, peer-reviewed journals and online through websites and social media. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/96530 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026706 English http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP fulltext
spellingShingle Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
Research capacity
evaluation capacity
partnerships
public health
causal loop diagram
systems thinking
PUBLIC-HEALTH
THINKING
MODEL
DYNAMICS
Research capacity
causal loop diagram
evaluation capacity
partnerships
public health
systems thinking
Australia
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Capacity Building
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Health Services Administration
Humans
Intersectoral Collaboration
Policy Making
Public Health Systems Research
Research Design
Sexual Health
Systems Integration
Virus Diseases
Humans
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Virus Diseases
Health Services Administration
Research Design
Systems Integration
Policy Making
Australia
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Capacity Building
Intersectoral Collaboration
Public Health Systems Research
Sexual Health
Tobin, Rochelle
Hallett, Jonathan
Lobo, Roanna
Maycock, Bruce
Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol
title Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol
title_full Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol
title_fullStr Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol
title_full_unstemmed Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol
title_short Taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: A protocol
title_sort taking a systems approach to explore the impacts and outcomes of a research and evaluation capacity building partnership: a protocol
topic Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
Research capacity
evaluation capacity
partnerships
public health
causal loop diagram
systems thinking
PUBLIC-HEALTH
THINKING
MODEL
DYNAMICS
Research capacity
causal loop diagram
evaluation capacity
partnerships
public health
systems thinking
Australia
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Capacity Building
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Health Services Administration
Humans
Intersectoral Collaboration
Policy Making
Public Health Systems Research
Research Design
Sexual Health
Systems Integration
Virus Diseases
Humans
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Virus Diseases
Health Services Administration
Research Design
Systems Integration
Policy Making
Australia
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Capacity Building
Intersectoral Collaboration
Public Health Systems Research
Sexual Health
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/96530