Understanding project cost contingency: A survey

Patrascu (1988) observed nearly two decades ago that "contingency is probably the most misunderstood, misinterpreted, and misapplied word in project execution." Since that time there has been little empirical research into project people’s understanding of the concept of project cost conti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baccarini, David
Other Authors: Sidwell, A.
Format: Conference Paper
Published: Queensland University of Technology 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9641
_version_ 1848746008396169216
author Baccarini, David
author2 Sidwell, A.
author_facet Sidwell, A.
Baccarini, David
author_sort Baccarini, David
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Patrascu (1988) observed nearly two decades ago that "contingency is probably the most misunderstood, misinterpreted, and misapplied word in project execution." Since that time there has been little empirical research into project people’s understanding of the concept of project cost contingency. This paper reports the results of a survey of 78 project practitioners’ comprehension of issues pertaining to project cost contingency. Whilst there is consensus that cost contingency is a reserve of money which should be used for scope changes, a key finding is that there is a lack of appreciation that project cost contingency is a risk management notion. Consequently, the majority of practitioners (77%) continue to use a deterministic percentage approach for estimating project cost contingency. Furthermore, 46% of respondents work in organisations that do not have a policy on contingency and 36% do not manage the use of contingency. Overall, this suggests there is significant room for improvement in the understanding, estimation and management of project cost contingency.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:26:25Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-9641
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:26:25Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Queensland University of Technology
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-96412017-01-30T11:13:56Z Understanding project cost contingency: A survey Baccarini, David Sidwell, A. project risk management contingency Patrascu (1988) observed nearly two decades ago that "contingency is probably the most misunderstood, misinterpreted, and misapplied word in project execution." Since that time there has been little empirical research into project people’s understanding of the concept of project cost contingency. This paper reports the results of a survey of 78 project practitioners’ comprehension of issues pertaining to project cost contingency. Whilst there is consensus that cost contingency is a reserve of money which should be used for scope changes, a key finding is that there is a lack of appreciation that project cost contingency is a risk management notion. Consequently, the majority of practitioners (77%) continue to use a deterministic percentage approach for estimating project cost contingency. Furthermore, 46% of respondents work in organisations that do not have a policy on contingency and 36% do not manage the use of contingency. Overall, this suggests there is significant room for improvement in the understanding, estimation and management of project cost contingency. 2005 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9641 Queensland University of Technology fulltext
spellingShingle project risk management
contingency
Baccarini, David
Understanding project cost contingency: A survey
title Understanding project cost contingency: A survey
title_full Understanding project cost contingency: A survey
title_fullStr Understanding project cost contingency: A survey
title_full_unstemmed Understanding project cost contingency: A survey
title_short Understanding project cost contingency: A survey
title_sort understanding project cost contingency: a survey
topic project risk management
contingency
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9641