Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review

Aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in the facial complex and correlating them to the dosage and side effects through a systematic review. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases. Quality of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ganjigatti, R.R., Bennani, V., Aarts, J.M., Choi, J.J.E., Brunton, Paul
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/94918
_version_ 1848765945676300288
author Ganjigatti, R.R.
Bennani, V.
Aarts, J.M.
Choi, J.J.E.
Brunton, Paul
author_facet Ganjigatti, R.R.
Bennani, V.
Aarts, J.M.
Choi, J.J.E.
Brunton, Paul
author_sort Ganjigatti, R.R.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in the facial complex and correlating them to the dosage and side effects through a systematic review. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases. Quality of studies was appraised through the GRADE system. This review follows the ‘Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols’ (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Efficacy was analyzed through improvement rate and effect sizes. Graphical comparison of efficacy and ocular adverse effects (adverse effects around the eye) at various anatomical locations was made by calculating the average improvement rate and adverse events. Results: Twenty-five studies were included in this systematic review after application of the inclusion criteria. Moderate to severe cases in glabellar, lateral canthal, and forehead regions showed higher improvement rates between 20U to 50U, with an effect lasting up to 120 days. Gender and age seemed to have a direct effect on efficacy. Headaches were the most common adverse effect, followed by injection site bruising; all adverse effects resolved within 3-4 days. Conclusions: Treatment with Botulinum toxinA to enhance esthetics of facial complex is efficient and safe at all recommended dosages. Presence of complexing proteins influenced the efficacy of BoNT-A. undesirable muscular adverse effects around the eyes were more predominant when treating the glabellar region. There was no correlation found between the BoNT-A dosage and side effects, however, an increase in dosage did not always lead to an increase in efficacy.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:43:19Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-94918
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language eng
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:43:19Z
publishDate 2021
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-949182024-04-30T04:40:16Z Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review Ganjigatti, R.R. Bennani, V. Aarts, J.M. Choi, J.J.E. Brunton, Paul Botulinum Toxins, Type A Esthetics, Dental Meta-Analysis as Topic Skin Aging Esthetics, Dental Skin Aging Meta-Analysis as Topic Botulinum Toxins, Type A Aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in the facial complex and correlating them to the dosage and side effects through a systematic review. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases. Quality of studies was appraised through the GRADE system. This review follows the ‘Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols’ (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Efficacy was analyzed through improvement rate and effect sizes. Graphical comparison of efficacy and ocular adverse effects (adverse effects around the eye) at various anatomical locations was made by calculating the average improvement rate and adverse events. Results: Twenty-five studies were included in this systematic review after application of the inclusion criteria. Moderate to severe cases in glabellar, lateral canthal, and forehead regions showed higher improvement rates between 20U to 50U, with an effect lasting up to 120 days. Gender and age seemed to have a direct effect on efficacy. Headaches were the most common adverse effect, followed by injection site bruising; all adverse effects resolved within 3-4 days. Conclusions: Treatment with Botulinum toxinA to enhance esthetics of facial complex is efficient and safe at all recommended dosages. Presence of complexing proteins influenced the efficacy of BoNT-A. undesirable muscular adverse effects around the eyes were more predominant when treating the glabellar region. There was no correlation found between the BoNT-A dosage and side effects, however, an increase in dosage did not always lead to an increase in efficacy. 2021 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/94918 10.1590/0103-6440202104127 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ fulltext
spellingShingle Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Esthetics, Dental
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Skin Aging
Esthetics, Dental
Skin Aging
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Ganjigatti, R.R.
Bennani, V.
Aarts, J.M.
Choi, J.J.E.
Brunton, Paul
Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review
title Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review
title_full Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review
title_short Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review
title_sort efficacy and safety of botulinum toxina for improving esthetics in facial complex: a systematic review
topic Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Esthetics, Dental
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Skin Aging
Esthetics, Dental
Skin Aging
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/94918