Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth)

Since 1904, Australia has sought to protect shippers by prohibiting parties to contracts such as bills of lading from contracting out of Australian law and jurisdiction. Today, this protection lives on in s 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth). This section has recently been in the spot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Allison, Simon
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93986
_version_ 1848765824963182592
author Allison, Simon
author_facet Allison, Simon
author_sort Allison, Simon
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Since 1904, Australia has sought to protect shippers by prohibiting parties to contracts such as bills of lading from contracting out of Australian law and jurisdiction. Today, this protection lives on in s 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth). This section has recently been in the spotlight following a divergence of authority relating to its scope. This article argues that legislative revision of s 11 is necessary in order to clarify its scope and to ensure that its operation is consistent with the underlying policies justifying its existence, as expressed by the legislature.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:41:24Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-93986
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:41:24Z
publishDate 2014
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-939862024-01-19T07:15:18Z Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth) Allison, Simon Since 1904, Australia has sought to protect shippers by prohibiting parties to contracts such as bills of lading from contracting out of Australian law and jurisdiction. Today, this protection lives on in s 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth). This section has recently been in the spotlight following a divergence of authority relating to its scope. This article argues that legislative revision of s 11 is necessary in order to clarify its scope and to ensure that its operation is consistent with the underlying policies justifying its existence, as expressed by the legislature. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93986 fulltext
spellingShingle Allison, Simon
Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth)
title Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth)
title_full Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth)
title_fullStr Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth)
title_full_unstemmed Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth)
title_short Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents — Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth)
title_sort choice of law and forum clauses in shipping documents — revising section 11 of the carriage of goods by sea act 1991 (cth)
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93986