Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences

Despite significant impacts to mental health and support-seeking, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) stigma remains under-studied and poorly understood. Recently, the NSSI Stigma Framework was proposed, conceptualizing NSSI stigma as comprising six constructs (origin, concealability, course, peril, aes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Staniland, Lexy, Hasking, Penelope, Lewis, S.P., Boyes, Mark, Mirichlis, Sylvanna
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93743
_version_ 1848765777115611136
author Staniland, Lexy
Hasking, Penelope
Lewis, S.P.
Boyes, Mark
Mirichlis, Sylvanna
author_facet Staniland, Lexy
Hasking, Penelope
Lewis, S.P.
Boyes, Mark
Mirichlis, Sylvanna
author_sort Staniland, Lexy
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Despite significant impacts to mental health and support-seeking, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) stigma remains under-studied and poorly understood. Recently, the NSSI Stigma Framework was proposed, conceptualizing NSSI stigma as comprising six constructs (origin, concealability, course, peril, aesthetics, disruptiveness) that manifest across four perspectives (public, self, anticipated, enacted). The present study investigated the extent to which this framework can account for individuals’ NSSI stigma experiences using a directed content analysis. Written responses from 99 university undergraduates (M age = 21.5, SD = 3.7; 83.8% female) generated 731 data units for analysis, of which 299 (40.9%) were coded. Results demonstrated support for the public and enacted perspectives, with participants describing stigma experiences within friendships, families, schools, and workplaces. Data pointed to both direct and indirect experiences of public stigma, suggesting a more nuanced understanding of this perspective is required. While there was sufficient support for a majority of elements, more work is needed to verify the applicability of the self and anticipated perspectives. Our findings contribute to a growing body of research investigating NSSI stigma, and provide preliminary support for the utility of the NSSI Stigma Framework in identifying multiple facets of NSSI stigma. Implications for intervention and future research are discussed.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:40:38Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-93743
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:40:38Z
publishDate 2023
publisher TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-937432023-12-21T01:45:21Z Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences Staniland, Lexy Hasking, Penelope Lewis, S.P. Boyes, Mark Mirichlis, Sylvanna Social Sciences Criminology & Penology Psychology, Social Sociology Psychology MENTAL-ILLNESS HEALTH HARM METAANALYSIS ADOLESCENTS RELIABILITY CONCEALMENT PREVALENCE AGREEMENT PEOPLE Despite significant impacts to mental health and support-seeking, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) stigma remains under-studied and poorly understood. Recently, the NSSI Stigma Framework was proposed, conceptualizing NSSI stigma as comprising six constructs (origin, concealability, course, peril, aesthetics, disruptiveness) that manifest across four perspectives (public, self, anticipated, enacted). The present study investigated the extent to which this framework can account for individuals’ NSSI stigma experiences using a directed content analysis. Written responses from 99 university undergraduates (M age = 21.5, SD = 3.7; 83.8% female) generated 731 data units for analysis, of which 299 (40.9%) were coded. Results demonstrated support for the public and enacted perspectives, with participants describing stigma experiences within friendships, families, schools, and workplaces. Data pointed to both direct and indirect experiences of public stigma, suggesting a more nuanced understanding of this perspective is required. While there was sufficient support for a majority of elements, more work is needed to verify the applicability of the self and anticipated perspectives. Our findings contribute to a growing body of research investigating NSSI stigma, and provide preliminary support for the utility of the NSSI Stigma Framework in identifying multiple facets of NSSI stigma. Implications for intervention and future research are discussed. 2023 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93743 10.1080/01639625.2022.2038022 English http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043 TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC fulltext
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Criminology & Penology
Psychology, Social
Sociology
Psychology
MENTAL-ILLNESS
HEALTH
HARM
METAANALYSIS
ADOLESCENTS
RELIABILITY
CONCEALMENT
PREVALENCE
AGREEMENT
PEOPLE
Staniland, Lexy
Hasking, Penelope
Lewis, S.P.
Boyes, Mark
Mirichlis, Sylvanna
Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences
title Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences
title_full Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences
title_fullStr Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences
title_full_unstemmed Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences
title_short Crazy, Weak, and Incompetent: A Directed Content Analysis of Self-Injury Stigma Experiences
title_sort crazy, weak, and incompetent: a directed content analysis of self-injury stigma experiences
topic Social Sciences
Criminology & Penology
Psychology, Social
Sociology
Psychology
MENTAL-ILLNESS
HEALTH
HARM
METAANALYSIS
ADOLESCENTS
RELIABILITY
CONCEALMENT
PREVALENCE
AGREEMENT
PEOPLE
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93743