Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury

Background: We aimed to identify profiles of ambivalence among individuals with a history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and tested whether profiles differed across various theoretically informed constructs: NSSI-related characteristics, cognitive (outcome expectancies, self-efficacy to resist N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gray, Nicole, Uren, Hannah, Pemberton, E., Boyes, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: WILEY 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93202
_version_ 1848765710626455552
author Gray, Nicole
Uren, Hannah
Pemberton, E.
Boyes, Mark
author_facet Gray, Nicole
Uren, Hannah
Pemberton, E.
Boyes, Mark
author_sort Gray, Nicole
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: We aimed to identify profiles of ambivalence among individuals with a history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and tested whether profiles differed across various theoretically informed constructs: NSSI-related characteristics, cognitive (outcome expectancies, self-efficacy to resist NSSI), emotional (psychological distress, difficulties in emotion regulation), personality, and incentives to engage/not engage in NSSI. Methods: Individuals with a lifetime history of NSSI (n = 224) reported the extent to which they wanted to and did not want to engage in NSSI and completed well-validated measures of the constructs of interest. Results: Latent profile analysis indicated four ambivalence profiles (avoid: n = 39; moderately ambivalent: n = 85; highly ambivalent: n = 30; approach: n = 70). The profiles differed across a number of NSSI-related characteristics, cognitive, emotional, and incentive-related variables. Differences between the ambivalence profiles and the avoid/approach profiles varied across constructs. For example, the ambivalence and approach profiles were similar for NSSI-related outcome expectancies, but the ambivalence and avoidance profiles were similar for self-efficacy to resist NSSI. Conclusion: Findings highlight variation between the desire to engage or not engage in NSSI that are consistent with the notion of ambivalence. Understanding these differences may allow for a more person-centered approach in treatment for NSSI.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:39:35Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-93202
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:39:35Z
publishDate 2023
publisher WILEY
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-932022023-10-06T05:55:26Z Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury Gray, Nicole Uren, Hannah Pemberton, E. Boyes, Mark Social Sciences Psychology, Clinical Psychology ambivalence behavior desire nonsuicidal self-injury profiles METAANALYSIS PREVALENCE AVOIDANCE ambivalence behavior desire nonsuicidal self-injury profiles Humans Emotions Self-Injurious Behavior Affect Personality Emotional Regulation Humans Self-Injurious Behavior Emotions Affect Personality Emotional Regulation Background: We aimed to identify profiles of ambivalence among individuals with a history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and tested whether profiles differed across various theoretically informed constructs: NSSI-related characteristics, cognitive (outcome expectancies, self-efficacy to resist NSSI), emotional (psychological distress, difficulties in emotion regulation), personality, and incentives to engage/not engage in NSSI. Methods: Individuals with a lifetime history of NSSI (n = 224) reported the extent to which they wanted to and did not want to engage in NSSI and completed well-validated measures of the constructs of interest. Results: Latent profile analysis indicated four ambivalence profiles (avoid: n = 39; moderately ambivalent: n = 85; highly ambivalent: n = 30; approach: n = 70). The profiles differed across a number of NSSI-related characteristics, cognitive, emotional, and incentive-related variables. Differences between the ambivalence profiles and the avoid/approach profiles varied across constructs. For example, the ambivalence and approach profiles were similar for NSSI-related outcome expectancies, but the ambivalence and avoidance profiles were similar for self-efficacy to resist NSSI. Conclusion: Findings highlight variation between the desire to engage or not engage in NSSI that are consistent with the notion of ambivalence. Understanding these differences may allow for a more person-centered approach in treatment for NSSI. 2023 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93202 10.1002/jclp.23494 English http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ WILEY fulltext
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Psychology, Clinical
Psychology
ambivalence
behavior
desire
nonsuicidal self-injury
profiles
METAANALYSIS
PREVALENCE
AVOIDANCE
ambivalence
behavior
desire
nonsuicidal self-injury
profiles
Humans
Emotions
Self-Injurious Behavior
Affect
Personality
Emotional Regulation
Humans
Self-Injurious Behavior
Emotions
Affect
Personality
Emotional Regulation
Gray, Nicole
Uren, Hannah
Pemberton, E.
Boyes, Mark
Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury
title Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury
title_full Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury
title_fullStr Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury
title_full_unstemmed Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury
title_short Profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury
title_sort profiling ambivalence in the context of nonsuicidal self-injury
topic Social Sciences
Psychology, Clinical
Psychology
ambivalence
behavior
desire
nonsuicidal self-injury
profiles
METAANALYSIS
PREVALENCE
AVOIDANCE
ambivalence
behavior
desire
nonsuicidal self-injury
profiles
Humans
Emotions
Self-Injurious Behavior
Affect
Personality
Emotional Regulation
Humans
Self-Injurious Behavior
Emotions
Affect
Personality
Emotional Regulation
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/93202