An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law

This article examines the meaning of "truth" in philosophy and in the law and it identifies notable dissonance between the two discourses. Deep divisions run within philosophy on the meaning of the term, while an examination of the term in the context of the law also reveals tensions. Ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernandez, Joseph
Format: Journal Article
Published: Hyde Park Press 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9181
_version_ 1848745876073218048
author Fernandez, Joseph
author_facet Fernandez, Joseph
author_sort Fernandez, Joseph
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This article examines the meaning of "truth" in philosophy and in the law and it identifies notable dissonance between the two discourses. Deep divisions run within philosophy on the meaning of the term, while an examination of the term in the context of the law also reveals tensions. There are long held views that the truth is subservient to justice; and that proof rather than the truth is the justice system's main concern. That position, however, is not unanimous. A paradox that flows from this discussion is that there are at least two, potentially conflicting, kinds of truth in a trial- substantive truth and formal legal truth. The ramifications are significant.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:24:19Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-9181
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:24:19Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Hyde Park Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-91812017-01-30T11:11:02Z An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law Fernandez, Joseph This article examines the meaning of "truth" in philosophy and in the law and it identifies notable dissonance between the two discourses. Deep divisions run within philosophy on the meaning of the term, while an examination of the term in the context of the law also reveals tensions. There are long held views that the truth is subservient to justice; and that proof rather than the truth is the justice system's main concern. That position, however, is not unanimous. A paradox that flows from this discussion is that there are at least two, potentially conflicting, kinds of truth in a trial- substantive truth and formal legal truth. The ramifications are significant. 2009 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9181 Hyde Park Press fulltext
spellingShingle Fernandez, Joseph
An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law
title An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law
title_full An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law
title_fullStr An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law
title_full_unstemmed An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law
title_short An Exploration of the Meaning of Truth in Philosophy and Law
title_sort exploration of the meaning of truth in philosophy and law
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9181