Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access

Access models for dissemination of content are increasingly prevalent, yet Australian copyright law does not adequately distinguish background copying from public access to expression. The scope of the reproduction right must be reformulated, as the communication right (which includes ‘making availa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Foong, Cheryl
Format: Journal Article
Published: Sweet and Maxwell 2022
Online Access:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4193599
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/91743
_version_ 1848765584239493120
author Foong, Cheryl
author_facet Foong, Cheryl
author_sort Foong, Cheryl
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Access models for dissemination of content are increasingly prevalent, yet Australian copyright law does not adequately distinguish background copying from public access to expression. The scope of the reproduction right must be reformulated, as the communication right (which includes ‘making available’) ought to take centre stage in this age of access. In particular, copying for non-expressive use and for non-disseminative purposes should be considered immaterial and beyond the scope of the reproduction right. This comparative article examines judicial and legislative approaches to the issue in various jurisdictions. It proposes a revised infringement analysis for the reproduction right and uses three paradigm scenarios, from text and data mining to examples drawn from US case law, to illustrate its application. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European Intellectual Property Review following peer review. The definitive published version Cheryl Foong, “Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access” (2022) 44 E.I.P.R. 513–533 is available online on Westlaw UK
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:37:34Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-91743
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:37:34Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Sweet and Maxwell
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-917432023-06-06T02:49:26Z Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access Foong, Cheryl Access models for dissemination of content are increasingly prevalent, yet Australian copyright law does not adequately distinguish background copying from public access to expression. The scope of the reproduction right must be reformulated, as the communication right (which includes ‘making available’) ought to take centre stage in this age of access. In particular, copying for non-expressive use and for non-disseminative purposes should be considered immaterial and beyond the scope of the reproduction right. This comparative article examines judicial and legislative approaches to the issue in various jurisdictions. It proposes a revised infringement analysis for the reproduction right and uses three paradigm scenarios, from text and data mining to examples drawn from US case law, to illustrate its application. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European Intellectual Property Review following peer review. The definitive published version Cheryl Foong, “Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access” (2022) 44 E.I.P.R. 513–533 is available online on Westlaw UK 2022 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/91743 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4193599 Sweet and Maxwell unknown
spellingShingle Foong, Cheryl
Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access
title Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access
title_full Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access
title_fullStr Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access
title_full_unstemmed Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access
title_short Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access
title_sort immaterial copying in the age of access
url https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4193599
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/91743