Effect of grounded blast furnace slag and rice husk ash on performance of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) subjected to impact loading

This paper investigates the effect of using alternative cementitious constituents on the compressive performance of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) for both static and dynamic conditions. The grounded blast furnace slag (GBFS) and rice husk ash (RHA) with different portions were used to repla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ha, San, Marundrury, S.S., Pham, Thong, Pournasiri, E., Shi, F., Hao, H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: ELSEVIER SCI LTD 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL180100196
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/91602
Description
Summary:This paper investigates the effect of using alternative cementitious constituents on the compressive performance of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) for both static and dynamic conditions. The grounded blast furnace slag (GBFS) and rice husk ash (RHA) with different portions were used to replace 30% ordinary Portland cement (OPC) of a reference mix (UHPC-R1). Two alternative UHPC mixes including an UHPC mix with 30% GBFS mix (UHPC-AC1) and an UHPC mix with 15% GBFS and 15% RHA mix (UHPC-AC2) were considered. The quasi-static compressive strength and dynamic compressive strength of the proposed UHPC mixes were then determined using a compression testing machine and a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, respectively. The results indicated that UHPC-AC1 and UHPC-AC2 yielded a comparable performance compared to the reference mix UHPC-R1. In particular, the static compressive strength of UHPC-AC1 and UHPC-AC2 mixes were found to only be 5% and 10% less than those of the UHPC-R1 mix, respectively. In addition, the study also found that UHPC-AC1 and UHPC-AC2 achieved a similar dynamic compressive strength compared to the UHPC-R1, and the compressive strength of UHPC-AC1 and UHPC-AC2 were not strain rate sensitive. For the environmental aspect, UHPC-AC1 and UHPC-AC2 have a lower embedded CO2 emission index compared to the reference UHPC-R1.