Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review

Objective This integrative review aimed to examine and understand nurses’ experiences of voluntary error reporting (VER) and elucidate factors underlying their decision to engage in VER. Method This is an integrative review based on Whittemore & Knafl five-stage framework. A systematic sear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Woo, Jeffrey Ming Wei, Avery, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier 2021
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/90422
_version_ 1848765377876590592
author Woo, Jeffrey Ming Wei
Avery, Mark
author_facet Woo, Jeffrey Ming Wei
Avery, Mark
author_sort Woo, Jeffrey Ming Wei
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective This integrative review aimed to examine and understand nurses’ experiences of voluntary error reporting (VER) and elucidate factors underlying their decision to engage in VER. Method This is an integrative review based on Whittemore & Knafl five-stage framework. A systematic search guided by the PRISMA 2020 approach was performed on four electronic databases: CINAHL, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase. Peer-reviewed articles published in the English language from January 2010 to December 2020 were retrieved and screened for relevancy. Results Totally 31 papers were included in this review following the quality appraisal. A constant comparative approach was used to synthesize findings of eligible studies to report nurses' experiences of VER represented by three major themes: nurses' beliefs, behavior, and sentiments towards VER; nurses' perceived enabling factors of VER and nurses' perceived inhibiting factors of VER. Findings of this review revealed that nurses’ experiences of VER were less than ideal. Firstly, these negative experiences were accounted for by the interplays of factors that influenced their attitudes, perceptions, emotions, and practices. Additionally, their negative experiences were underpinned by a spectrum of system, administrative and organizational factors that focuses on attributing the error to human failure characterized by an unsupportive, blaming, and punitive approach to error management. Conclusion Findings of this review add to the body of knowledge to inform on the areas of focus to guide nursing management perspectives to strengthen institutional efforts to improve nurses' recognition, reception, and contribution towards VER. It is recommended that nursing leaders prioritize and invest in strategies to enhance existing institutional error management approaches to establish a just and open patient safety culture that would promote positivity in nurses’ overall experiences towards VER.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:34:17Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-90422
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:34:17Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-904222023-03-08T01:14:50Z Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review Woo, Jeffrey Ming Wei Avery, Mark Objective This integrative review aimed to examine and understand nurses’ experiences of voluntary error reporting (VER) and elucidate factors underlying their decision to engage in VER. Method This is an integrative review based on Whittemore & Knafl five-stage framework. A systematic search guided by the PRISMA 2020 approach was performed on four electronic databases: CINAHL, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase. Peer-reviewed articles published in the English language from January 2010 to December 2020 were retrieved and screened for relevancy. Results Totally 31 papers were included in this review following the quality appraisal. A constant comparative approach was used to synthesize findings of eligible studies to report nurses' experiences of VER represented by three major themes: nurses' beliefs, behavior, and sentiments towards VER; nurses' perceived enabling factors of VER and nurses' perceived inhibiting factors of VER. Findings of this review revealed that nurses’ experiences of VER were less than ideal. Firstly, these negative experiences were accounted for by the interplays of factors that influenced their attitudes, perceptions, emotions, and practices. Additionally, their negative experiences were underpinned by a spectrum of system, administrative and organizational factors that focuses on attributing the error to human failure characterized by an unsupportive, blaming, and punitive approach to error management. Conclusion Findings of this review add to the body of knowledge to inform on the areas of focus to guide nursing management perspectives to strengthen institutional efforts to improve nurses' recognition, reception, and contribution towards VER. It is recommended that nursing leaders prioritize and invest in strategies to enhance existing institutional error management approaches to establish a just and open patient safety culture that would promote positivity in nurses’ overall experiences towards VER. 2021 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/90422 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.07.004 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Elsevier fulltext
spellingShingle Woo, Jeffrey Ming Wei
Avery, Mark
Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review
title Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review
title_full Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review
title_fullStr Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review
title_short Nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review
title_sort nurses’ experiences in voluntary error reporting: an integrative literature review
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/90422