Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force

In this paper, I examine the notion that covert action should be part of the intelligence mission and that, in some cases, intelligence agencies are better placed to use lethal force for dealing with certain “in-between” or “grey” areas of conflict than the military. I start out by providing a brief...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ford, Shannon
Format: Conference Paper
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/89638
_version_ 1848765262760771584
author Ford, Shannon
author_facet Ford, Shannon
author_sort Ford, Shannon
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In this paper, I examine the notion that covert action should be part of the intelligence mission and that, in some cases, intelligence agencies are better placed to use lethal force for dealing with certain “in-between” or “grey” areas of conflict than the military. I start out by providing a brief analysis of the conventional perspective for morally justifying the use of lethal force by military combatants in just war theory. I argue that the conventional account for justifying the military use of lethal force in war grants military combatants special permissions for killing enemy combatants. Next I discuss the ways in which changes in modern conflict have created problems for the conventional approach. I demonstrate that the conventional approach alone is insufficient for dealing with these problems. Finally, I examine the claim that these types of problems are better addressed by a distinct intelligence paradigm for using lethal force. It is sometimes argued that one of the missions of intelligence agencies is to conduct covert action on behalf of the state. I dispute this claim and argue that although intelligence agencies have an important role to play, the use of lethal force should remain a distinctly military responsibility.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:32:28Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-89638
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:32:28Z
publishDate 2014
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-896382022-11-21T03:44:46Z Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force Ford, Shannon In this paper, I examine the notion that covert action should be part of the intelligence mission and that, in some cases, intelligence agencies are better placed to use lethal force for dealing with certain “in-between” or “grey” areas of conflict than the military. I start out by providing a brief analysis of the conventional perspective for morally justifying the use of lethal force by military combatants in just war theory. I argue that the conventional account for justifying the military use of lethal force in war grants military combatants special permissions for killing enemy combatants. Next I discuss the ways in which changes in modern conflict have created problems for the conventional approach. I demonstrate that the conventional approach alone is insufficient for dealing with these problems. Finally, I examine the claim that these types of problems are better addressed by a distinct intelligence paradigm for using lethal force. It is sometimes argued that one of the missions of intelligence agencies is to conduct covert action on behalf of the state. I dispute this claim and argue that although intelligence agencies have an important role to play, the use of lethal force should remain a distinctly military responsibility. 2014 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/89638 fulltext
spellingShingle Ford, Shannon
Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force
title Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force
title_full Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force
title_fullStr Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force
title_full_unstemmed Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force
title_short Intelligence Agencies and the Use of Lethal Force
title_sort intelligence agencies and the use of lethal force
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/89638