Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading
Mortar-less construction with interlocking bricks has many advantages, such as improved construction efficiency and relatively low requirements on labour skills. Nevertheless, the seismic performance of interlocking brick structures is not well understood yet. In this paper, laboratory tests and num...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
2022
|
| Online Access: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP170100846 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/88892 |
| _version_ | 1848765105097932800 |
|---|---|
| author | Xie, Guanyu Zhang, Xihong Hao, Hong Bi, Kaiming Lin, Yuanzheng |
| author_facet | Xie, Guanyu Zhang, Xihong Hao, Hong Bi, Kaiming Lin, Yuanzheng |
| author_sort | Xie, Guanyu |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Mortar-less construction with interlocking bricks has many advantages, such as improved construction efficiency and relatively low requirements on labour skills. Nevertheless, the seismic performance of interlocking brick structures is not well understood yet. In this paper, laboratory tests and numerical modelling are carried out to investigate the seismic behaviour of interlocking brick walls. Laboratory shaking table tests are performed on a scaled reinforced mortar-less interlocking brick wall. The response and damage modes under in-plane seismic loading are investigated. A detailed numerical model is then generated and validated with the laboratory testing data. Unlike the conventional masonry wall that diagonal shear damage governs the failure, the interlocking brick wall exhibits rocking responses, whose damage is mainly at the two bottom corners of the wall. Full-scale interlocking brick walls are then modelled and compared with conventional concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls bonded by mortar. Comparisons are made between the seismic resistances and damage modes of the two walls. The influences of ground motion intensities, vertical components of seismic excitations and different seismic time histories on the seismic behaviour of the interlocking brick wall are examined. It is found that the interlocking brick wall has a higher seismic resistance capacity than the conventional CMU wall. Inter-brick friction is the main energy dissipation mechanism in the interlocking brick wall. Because of the rocking response, vertical component of the ground motion significantly influences the damage of interlocking brick wall. The interlocking brick wall is insensitive to velocity pulses of ground motions due to its relatively high natural frequency. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:29:57Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-88892 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:29:57Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Springer Nature |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-888922022-07-27T04:16:32Z Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading Xie, Guanyu Zhang, Xihong Hao, Hong Bi, Kaiming Lin, Yuanzheng Mortar-less construction with interlocking bricks has many advantages, such as improved construction efficiency and relatively low requirements on labour skills. Nevertheless, the seismic performance of interlocking brick structures is not well understood yet. In this paper, laboratory tests and numerical modelling are carried out to investigate the seismic behaviour of interlocking brick walls. Laboratory shaking table tests are performed on a scaled reinforced mortar-less interlocking brick wall. The response and damage modes under in-plane seismic loading are investigated. A detailed numerical model is then generated and validated with the laboratory testing data. Unlike the conventional masonry wall that diagonal shear damage governs the failure, the interlocking brick wall exhibits rocking responses, whose damage is mainly at the two bottom corners of the wall. Full-scale interlocking brick walls are then modelled and compared with conventional concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls bonded by mortar. Comparisons are made between the seismic resistances and damage modes of the two walls. The influences of ground motion intensities, vertical components of seismic excitations and different seismic time histories on the seismic behaviour of the interlocking brick wall are examined. It is found that the interlocking brick wall has a higher seismic resistance capacity than the conventional CMU wall. Inter-brick friction is the main energy dissipation mechanism in the interlocking brick wall. Because of the rocking response, vertical component of the ground motion significantly influences the damage of interlocking brick wall. The interlocking brick wall is insensitive to velocity pulses of ground motions due to its relatively high natural frequency. 2022 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/88892 10.1007/s10518-022-01436-6 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP170100846 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Springer Nature fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Xie, Guanyu Zhang, Xihong Hao, Hong Bi, Kaiming Lin, Yuanzheng Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading |
| title | Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading |
| title_full | Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading |
| title_fullStr | Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading |
| title_short | Response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading |
| title_sort | response of reinforced mortar‑less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading |
| url | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP170100846 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/88892 |