Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild

European honey bees have been introduced across the globe and may compete with native bees for floral resources. Compounding effects of urbanization and introduced species on native bees are, however, unclear. Here, we investigated how honey bee abundance and foraging patterns related to those of na...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prendergast, Kit, Dixon, Kingsley, Bateman, Bill
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: OXFORD UNIV PRESS 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/87411
_version_ 1848764913439211520
author Prendergast, Kit
Dixon, Kingsley
Bateman, Bill
author_facet Prendergast, Kit
Dixon, Kingsley
Bateman, Bill
author_sort Prendergast, Kit
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description European honey bees have been introduced across the globe and may compete with native bees for floral resources. Compounding effects of urbanization and introduced species on native bees are, however, unclear. Here, we investigated how honey bee abundance and foraging patterns related to those of native bee abundance and diversity in residential gardens and native vegetation remnants for 2 years in urbanized areas of the Southwest Australian biodiversity hotspot and assessed how niche overlap influenced these relationships. Honey bees did not overtly suppress native bee abundance; however, complex relationships emerged when analysing these relationships according to body size, time of day and floral resource levels. Native bee richness was positively correlated with overall honeybee abundance in the first year, but negatively correlated in the second year, and varied with body size. Native bees that had higher resource overlap with honey bees were negatively associated with honey bee abundance, and resource overlap between honey bees and native bees was higher in residential gardens. Relationships with honey bees varied between native bee taxa, reflecting adaptations to different flora, plus specialization. Thus, competition with introduced bees varies by species and location, mediated by dietary breadth and overlap and by other life-history traits of individual bee species.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:26:54Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-87411
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:26:54Z
publishDate 2021
publisher OXFORD UNIV PRESS
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-874112022-02-03T08:47:56Z Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild Prendergast, Kit Dixon, Kingsley Bateman, Bill Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Evolutionary Biology Apis mellifera Australia competition honey bees interspecific competition native bees niche overlap pollinators urbanization wild bees APIS-MELLIFERA REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS FLORAL RESOURCES BODY-SIZE FORAGING STRATEGIES SOLITARY BEES PATCH SIZE WILD BEES COMPETITION HYMENOPTERA European honey bees have been introduced across the globe and may compete with native bees for floral resources. Compounding effects of urbanization and introduced species on native bees are, however, unclear. Here, we investigated how honey bee abundance and foraging patterns related to those of native bee abundance and diversity in residential gardens and native vegetation remnants for 2 years in urbanized areas of the Southwest Australian biodiversity hotspot and assessed how niche overlap influenced these relationships. Honey bees did not overtly suppress native bee abundance; however, complex relationships emerged when analysing these relationships according to body size, time of day and floral resource levels. Native bee richness was positively correlated with overall honeybee abundance in the first year, but negatively correlated in the second year, and varied with body size. Native bees that had higher resource overlap with honey bees were negatively associated with honey bee abundance, and resource overlap between honey bees and native bees was higher in residential gardens. Relationships with honey bees varied between native bee taxa, reflecting adaptations to different flora, plus specialization. Thus, competition with introduced bees varies by species and location, mediated by dietary breadth and overlap and by other life-history traits of individual bee species. 2021 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/87411 10.1093/biolinnean/blab024 English OXFORD UNIV PRESS restricted
spellingShingle Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Evolutionary Biology
Apis mellifera
Australia
competition
honey bees
interspecific competition
native bees
niche overlap
pollinators
urbanization
wild bees
APIS-MELLIFERA
REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS
FLORAL RESOURCES
BODY-SIZE
FORAGING STRATEGIES
SOLITARY BEES
PATCH SIZE
WILD BEES
COMPETITION
HYMENOPTERA
Prendergast, Kit
Dixon, Kingsley
Bateman, Bill
Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild
title Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild
title_full Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild
title_fullStr Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild
title_full_unstemmed Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild
title_short Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild
title_sort interactions between the introduced european honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guild
topic Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Evolutionary Biology
Apis mellifera
Australia
competition
honey bees
interspecific competition
native bees
niche overlap
pollinators
urbanization
wild bees
APIS-MELLIFERA
REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS
FLORAL RESOURCES
BODY-SIZE
FORAGING STRATEGIES
SOLITARY BEES
PATCH SIZE
WILD BEES
COMPETITION
HYMENOPTERA
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/87411