Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review

This review evaluates the clinimetric properties of tactile assessments for children with cerebral palsy. Assessment of registration was reported using Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments (SWMs) or exteroception. Assessment of two-point discrimination was reported using the Disk-Criminator® or paperclip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Auld, M., Boyd, Roslyn, Moseley, G., Johnston, L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8614
_version_ 1848745709370605568
author Auld, M.
Boyd, Roslyn
Moseley, G.
Johnston, L.
author_facet Auld, M.
Boyd, Roslyn
Moseley, G.
Johnston, L.
author_sort Auld, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This review evaluates the clinimetric properties of tactile assessments for children with cerebral palsy. Assessment of registration was reported using Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments (SWMs) or exteroception. Assessment of two-point discrimination was reported using the Disk-Criminator® or paperclip methods; Single point localization and double simultaneous were reported from the Neurosensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA); graphaesthesia was reported from the Sensory Integration and Praxis Test (SIPT); and stereognosis was assessed using Manual Form Perception from the SIPT and the Klingels method (Klingels, K. et al. (2010). Upper limb motor and sensory impairments in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Can they be measured reliably? Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(5), 409-416) and the Cooper method (Cooper, J., Majnemer, A., Rosenblatt, B., & Birnbaum, R. (1995). The determination of sensory deficits in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 10, 300-309). The SIPT and NSMDA demonstrated stronger content validity. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for SIPT (ICC = 0.99) and exteroception (k = 0.88). Testretest reliability was excellent for exteroception (k = 0.89) and stereognosis (ICC = 0.86; 100%), moderate for SIPT (r = 0.690.74) and poor for SWM (k = 0.22). Together these assessments measure tactile registration and spatial perception. Temporal and textural tests are to be developed for comprehensive tactile examination. © 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:21:40Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-8614
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:21:40Z
publishDate 2011
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-86142017-09-13T14:52:45Z Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review Auld, M. Boyd, Roslyn Moseley, G. Johnston, L. This review evaluates the clinimetric properties of tactile assessments for children with cerebral palsy. Assessment of registration was reported using Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments (SWMs) or exteroception. Assessment of two-point discrimination was reported using the Disk-Criminator® or paperclip methods; Single point localization and double simultaneous were reported from the Neurosensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA); graphaesthesia was reported from the Sensory Integration and Praxis Test (SIPT); and stereognosis was assessed using Manual Form Perception from the SIPT and the Klingels method (Klingels, K. et al. (2010). Upper limb motor and sensory impairments in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Can they be measured reliably? Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(5), 409-416) and the Cooper method (Cooper, J., Majnemer, A., Rosenblatt, B., & Birnbaum, R. (1995). The determination of sensory deficits in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 10, 300-309). The SIPT and NSMDA demonstrated stronger content validity. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for SIPT (ICC = 0.99) and exteroception (k = 0.88). Testretest reliability was excellent for exteroception (k = 0.89) and stereognosis (ICC = 0.86; 100%), moderate for SIPT (r = 0.690.74) and poor for SWM (k = 0.22). Together these assessments measure tactile registration and spatial perception. Temporal and textural tests are to be developed for comprehensive tactile examination. © 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8614 10.3109/01942638.2011.572150 restricted
spellingShingle Auld, M.
Boyd, Roslyn
Moseley, G.
Johnston, L.
Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review
title Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review
title_full Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review
title_fullStr Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review
title_full_unstemmed Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review
title_short Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: A clinimetric review
title_sort tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: a clinimetric review
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/8614