An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators

This qualitative interview study investigated perceptions of quality held by university administrators, instructors and students of online science courses. The stakeholder groups had differing priorities when evaluating quality; their perceptions were highly dependent on context including the specif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Colby, Stephanie Mae-Fawcett
Format: Thesis
Published: Curtin University 2021
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/85349
_version_ 1848764731986280448
author Colby, Stephanie Mae-Fawcett
author_facet Colby, Stephanie Mae-Fawcett
author_sort Colby, Stephanie Mae-Fawcett
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This qualitative interview study investigated perceptions of quality held by university administrators, instructors and students of online science courses. The stakeholder groups had differing priorities when evaluating quality; their perceptions were highly dependent on context including the specific science discipline, whether the course was designed for science majors or non-majors, and laboratory goals. This study suggests all stakeholders’ perspectives and educational contexts be considered for constructive discussion of quality in online science courses.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:24:01Z
format Thesis
id curtin-20.500.11937-85349
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:24:01Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Curtin University
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-853492021-09-10T02:41:50Z An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators Colby, Stephanie Mae-Fawcett This qualitative interview study investigated perceptions of quality held by university administrators, instructors and students of online science courses. The stakeholder groups had differing priorities when evaluating quality; their perceptions were highly dependent on context including the specific science discipline, whether the course was designed for science majors or non-majors, and laboratory goals. This study suggests all stakeholders’ perspectives and educational contexts be considered for constructive discussion of quality in online science courses. 2021 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/85349 Curtin University fulltext
spellingShingle Colby, Stephanie Mae-Fawcett
An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators
title An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators
title_full An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators
title_fullStr An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators
title_short An Investigation of the Quality of Online Science Education at the Tertiary Level from the Perspectives of Students, Instructors and University Administrators
title_sort investigation of the quality of online science education at the tertiary level from the perspectives of students, instructors and university administrators
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/85349