An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality
A scoping review aims to systematically explore and map the research available from a wide range of sources. The objective of this study was to produce a scoping review checklist to guide future scoping studies to enable rigorous review and critique of phenomena of interest. The methods used include...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/83531 |
| _version_ | 1848764592367337472 |
|---|---|
| author | Cooper, S. Cant, R. Kelly, Michelle Levett-Jones, T. McKenna, L. Seaton, P. Bogossian, F. |
| author_facet | Cooper, S. Cant, R. Kelly, Michelle Levett-Jones, T. McKenna, L. Seaton, P. Bogossian, F. |
| author_sort | Cooper, S. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | A scoping review aims to systematically explore and map the research available from a wide range of sources. The objective of this study was to produce a scoping review checklist to guide future scoping studies to enable rigorous review and critique of phenomena of interest. The methods used included a review of literature, expert consensus group meetings, a modified Delphi survey and, finally, verification against recent scoping study examples. Results showed that the checklist was able to identify key elements of scoping reviews. The 22-item Scoping Review Checklist (SRC), which includes two optional stakeholder consultation items, has been developed using rigorous recommended approaches. The checklist can be used to guide the conduct and critique of scoping studies. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:21:48Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-83531 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:21:48Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-835312021-07-12T06:47:32Z An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality Cooper, S. Cant, R. Kelly, Michelle Levett-Jones, T. McKenna, L. Seaton, P. Bogossian, F. knowledge synthesis literature review reporting scoping review methodology synthesis method A scoping review aims to systematically explore and map the research available from a wide range of sources. The objective of this study was to produce a scoping review checklist to guide future scoping studies to enable rigorous review and critique of phenomena of interest. The methods used included a review of literature, expert consensus group meetings, a modified Delphi survey and, finally, verification against recent scoping study examples. Results showed that the checklist was able to identify key elements of scoping reviews. The 22-item Scoping Review Checklist (SRC), which includes two optional stakeholder consultation items, has been developed using rigorous recommended approaches. The checklist can be used to guide the conduct and critique of scoping studies. 2021 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/83531 10.1177/1054773819846024 eng restricted |
| spellingShingle | knowledge synthesis literature review reporting scoping review methodology synthesis method Cooper, S. Cant, R. Kelly, Michelle Levett-Jones, T. McKenna, L. Seaton, P. Bogossian, F. An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality |
| title | An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality |
| title_full | An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality |
| title_fullStr | An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality |
| title_short | An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality |
| title_sort | evidence-based checklist for improving scoping review quality |
| topic | knowledge synthesis literature review reporting scoping review methodology synthesis method |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/83531 |