| Summary: | Purpose – This study conducts a critical review of the research on the sharing economy to
identify its key intellectual foundations and their evolution and offers thematic and
methodological recommendations for future research to advance the domain.
Design/methodology/approach – A tri-method approach using bibliometric (co-citation)
analysis, thematic content analysis, and a quantitative systematic literature review was conducted
on sharing economy research in hospitality and tourism journals, up to and including May 2020.
Findings – The findings from the three methods were coherent and provide a clear picture of the
fact that while research on the sharing economy in hospitality and tourism has achieved
significant depth, the breadth of our understanding of this area remains somewhat limited. Each
of the three periods of research on the sharing economy identified in the study were marked by a
focus on specific thematic areas, with largely Western-situated researchers demonstrating limited
theoretical engagement and employing a limited range of methods and perspectives (disciplinary,
stakeholders, sectors) to examine these themes.
Research limitations/implications – Recommendations for future thematic research
opportunities are provided using a multi-level perspective (MLP). The present review does not
include research that incorporates the impacts of COVID-19, which has significantly disrupted
the hospitality and tourism industry and is the focus of current research in the field. However, the
review represents the largest and most comprehensive assessment of the state of research on the
sharing economy prior to COVID-19, and, as such, can serve as a valuable baseline for future
reviews of sharing economy research during and after the pandemic.
Originality/value – In contrast with previous literature reviews, the present review is
comprehensive in its scope, methodology, and temporal coverage of sharing economy research.
It also examines the evolution of research on the topic, enabling a more nuanced identification of
gaps and future thematic and methodological research opportunities.
|
|---|