MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.

Background: Inaccurate citations are erroneous quotations or instances of paraphrasing of previously published material that mislead readers about the claims of the cited source. They are often unaddressed due to underreporting, the inability of peer reviewers and editors to detect them, and editors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hosseini, Mohammad, Eve, Martin Paul, Gordijn, Bert, Neylon, Cameron
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/81458
_version_ 1848764368343269376
author Hosseini, Mohammad
Eve, Martin Paul
Gordijn, Bert
Neylon, Cameron
author_facet Hosseini, Mohammad
Eve, Martin Paul
Gordijn, Bert
Neylon, Cameron
author_sort Hosseini, Mohammad
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Inaccurate citations are erroneous quotations or instances of paraphrasing of previously published material that mislead readers about the claims of the cited source. They are often unaddressed due to underreporting, the inability of peer reviewers and editors to detect them, and editors' reluctance to publish corrections about them. In this paper, we propose a new tool that could be used to tackle their circulation. Methods: We provide a review of available data about inaccurate citations and analytically explore current ways of reporting and dealing with these inaccuracies. Consequently, we make a distinction between publication (i.e., first occurrence) and circulation (i.e., reuse) of inaccurate citations. Sloppy reading of published items, literature ambiguity and insufficient quality control in the editorial process are identified as factors that contribute to the publication of inaccurate citations. However, reiteration or copy-pasting without checking the validity of citations, paralleled with lack of resources/motivation to report/correct inaccurate citations contribute to their circulation. Results and discussion: We propose the development of an online annotation tool called "MyCites" as means with which to mark and map inaccurate citations. This tool allows ORCID users to annotate citations and alert authors (of the cited and citing articles) and also editors of journals where inaccurate citations are published. Each marked citation would travel with the digital version of the document (persistent identifiers) and be visible on websites that host peer-reviewed articles (journals' websites, Pubmed, etc.). In the future development of MyCites, challenges such as the conditions of correct/incorrect-ness and parties that should adjudicate that, and, the issue of dealing with incorrect reports need to be addressed.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:18:15Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-81458
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language eng
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:18:15Z
publishDate 2020
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-814582021-01-13T03:09:38Z MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications. Hosseini, Mohammad Eve, Martin Paul Gordijn, Bert Neylon, Cameron Annotations Editorial process Inaccurate citations Post-publication peer-review Research integrity Responsibilities Background: Inaccurate citations are erroneous quotations or instances of paraphrasing of previously published material that mislead readers about the claims of the cited source. They are often unaddressed due to underreporting, the inability of peer reviewers and editors to detect them, and editors' reluctance to publish corrections about them. In this paper, we propose a new tool that could be used to tackle their circulation. Methods: We provide a review of available data about inaccurate citations and analytically explore current ways of reporting and dealing with these inaccuracies. Consequently, we make a distinction between publication (i.e., first occurrence) and circulation (i.e., reuse) of inaccurate citations. Sloppy reading of published items, literature ambiguity and insufficient quality control in the editorial process are identified as factors that contribute to the publication of inaccurate citations. However, reiteration or copy-pasting without checking the validity of citations, paralleled with lack of resources/motivation to report/correct inaccurate citations contribute to their circulation. Results and discussion: We propose the development of an online annotation tool called "MyCites" as means with which to mark and map inaccurate citations. This tool allows ORCID users to annotate citations and alert authors (of the cited and citing articles) and also editors of journals where inaccurate citations are published. Each marked citation would travel with the digital version of the document (persistent identifiers) and be visible on websites that host peer-reviewed articles (journals' websites, Pubmed, etc.). In the future development of MyCites, challenges such as the conditions of correct/incorrect-ness and parties that should adjudicate that, and, the issue of dealing with incorrect reports need to be addressed. 2020 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/81458 10.1186/s41073-020-00099-8 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ fulltext
spellingShingle Annotations
Editorial process
Inaccurate citations
Post-publication peer-review
Research integrity
Responsibilities
Hosseini, Mohammad
Eve, Martin Paul
Gordijn, Bert
Neylon, Cameron
MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.
title MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.
title_full MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.
title_fullStr MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.
title_full_unstemmed MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.
title_short MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.
title_sort mycites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications.
topic Annotations
Editorial process
Inaccurate citations
Post-publication peer-review
Research integrity
Responsibilities
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/81458