Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions?

This article examines whether the fiscal interests of high tax jurisdictions, considered in the context of both developed and developing nations, are promoted or, in the alternative, preserved when concluding double tax agreements (DTAs) with low tax jurisdictions or those with territorial tax bases...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Castelyn, Donovan
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2020
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80809
_version_ 1848764275566313472
author Castelyn, Donovan
author_facet Castelyn, Donovan
author_sort Castelyn, Donovan
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This article examines whether the fiscal interests of high tax jurisdictions, considered in the context of both developed and developing nations, are promoted or, in the alternative, preserved when concluding double tax agreements (DTAs) with low tax jurisdictions or those with territorial tax bases. To resolve this position, the article considers the main tax fiscal and political drivers which motivate a jurisdiction to conclude a DTA. These drivers will then be contrasted with the specific tax policy objectives of high tax jurisdictions which forms the contextual framework for analysis. The central thesis of this article is that, regardless of the constitution of the high tax jurisdiction, the conclusion of a DTA with low tax or territorial counterparts broadly achieves an outcome contrary to the fiscal interests and objectives of the high tax jurisdiction, and often at the significant expense of the tax base.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:16:46Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-80809
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:16:46Z
publishDate 2020
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-808092021-01-15T04:30:09Z Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions? Castelyn, Donovan This article examines whether the fiscal interests of high tax jurisdictions, considered in the context of both developed and developing nations, are promoted or, in the alternative, preserved when concluding double tax agreements (DTAs) with low tax jurisdictions or those with territorial tax bases. To resolve this position, the article considers the main tax fiscal and political drivers which motivate a jurisdiction to conclude a DTA. These drivers will then be contrasted with the specific tax policy objectives of high tax jurisdictions which forms the contextual framework for analysis. The central thesis of this article is that, regardless of the constitution of the high tax jurisdiction, the conclusion of a DTA with low tax or territorial counterparts broadly achieves an outcome contrary to the fiscal interests and objectives of the high tax jurisdiction, and often at the significant expense of the tax base. 2020 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80809 restricted
spellingShingle Castelyn, Donovan
Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions?
title Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions?
title_full Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions?
title_fullStr Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions?
title_short Does the Conclusion of a DTA Serve the Fiscal Interests of High Tax Jurisdictions?
title_sort does the conclusion of a dta serve the fiscal interests of high tax jurisdictions?
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80809