Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design

Despite the established relationships between good work design and outcomes, poor work designs continue to persist. Little research has yet investigated the causes of this phenomenon. In this symposium we investigate how multilevel distal antecedents of work design, such as organizational change, in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Knight, Caroline, Van den Broeck, Anja, Tims, Maria, Gawke, Jason, Parker, Sharon, Scrimpshire, Alex, Wang, Cynthia, Edwards, Bryan, Ku, Gillian, Sarmah, Pallavi, Proost, Karin, Germeys, Filip, Man, Yin, Berkers, Hannah, Rispens, Sonja, Le Blanc, Pascale
Format: Conference Paper
Published: 2020
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80744
_version_ 1848764263889371136
author Knight, Caroline
Van den Broeck, Anja
Tims, Maria
Gawke, Jason
Parker, Sharon
Scrimpshire, Alex
Wang, Cynthia
Edwards, Bryan
Ku, Gillian
Sarmah, Pallavi
Proost, Karin
Germeys, Filip
Man, Yin
Berkers, Hannah
Rispens, Sonja
Le Blanc, Pascale
author_facet Knight, Caroline
Van den Broeck, Anja
Tims, Maria
Gawke, Jason
Parker, Sharon
Scrimpshire, Alex
Wang, Cynthia
Edwards, Bryan
Ku, Gillian
Sarmah, Pallavi
Proost, Karin
Germeys, Filip
Man, Yin
Berkers, Hannah
Rispens, Sonja
Le Blanc, Pascale
author_sort Knight, Caroline
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Despite the established relationships between good work design and outcomes, poor work designs continue to persist. Little research has yet investigated the causes of this phenomenon. In this symposium we investigate how multilevel distal antecedents of work design, such as organizational change, influence employee job crafting and managers’ job design behaviours, and also directly affect work design. The five included papers highlight novel antecedents of work design at different levels which are currently under-researched but which could have important implications for research and practice. We hope to stimulate conversation on the topic which helps to take this field forward in a timely manner. Despite the established relationships between good work design and outcomes, poor work designs continue to persist. Little research has yet investigated the causes of this phenomenon. A recent review – and to our knowledge the only review on this topic - highlighted that key antecedents of work design can be situated at multiple levels (Parker, Van den Broeck & Holman, 2017), including the global (e.g., international trade laws), national (e.g., employment regimes), occupational (e.g. values), organizational (e.g., HR practices, technology), group (e.g. team composition) and individual level (e.g., competence). These distal multilevel level factors then influence the proximal antecedents of work design in terms of employee job crafting and managers’ job design behaviours by impacting on their knowledge, skills, abilities, motivation and opportunities. Research on how employees change their job designs by crafting their work is expanding rapidly (Rudolph, Katz, Lavigne, & Zacher, 2017), and an initial experiment investigating the role of managers in the design of work indicated that people tend to design poor quality jobs unless they have experience as an organizational psychologist, work in high autonomous jobs, or are generally open to new experiences (Parker, Andrei & Van den Broeck, 2018). In this symposium, our goal is to take this work forward by further investigating how the multilevel distal antecedents of work design influence employee job crafting and managers’ job design behaviors and also directly affect work design. The included papers highlight novel antecedents of work design at different levels which are currently under-researched but which could have important implications for research and practice. We hope to stimulate conversation on the topic which helps to take this field forward in a timely manner.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:16:35Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-80744
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:16:35Z
publishDate 2020
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-807442021-01-15T03:31:37Z Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design Knight, Caroline Van den Broeck, Anja Tims, Maria Gawke, Jason Parker, Sharon Scrimpshire, Alex Wang, Cynthia Edwards, Bryan Ku, Gillian Sarmah, Pallavi Proost, Karin Germeys, Filip Man, Yin Berkers, Hannah Rispens, Sonja Le Blanc, Pascale Despite the established relationships between good work design and outcomes, poor work designs continue to persist. Little research has yet investigated the causes of this phenomenon. In this symposium we investigate how multilevel distal antecedents of work design, such as organizational change, influence employee job crafting and managers’ job design behaviours, and also directly affect work design. The five included papers highlight novel antecedents of work design at different levels which are currently under-researched but which could have important implications for research and practice. We hope to stimulate conversation on the topic which helps to take this field forward in a timely manner. Despite the established relationships between good work design and outcomes, poor work designs continue to persist. Little research has yet investigated the causes of this phenomenon. A recent review – and to our knowledge the only review on this topic - highlighted that key antecedents of work design can be situated at multiple levels (Parker, Van den Broeck & Holman, 2017), including the global (e.g., international trade laws), national (e.g., employment regimes), occupational (e.g. values), organizational (e.g., HR practices, technology), group (e.g. team composition) and individual level (e.g., competence). These distal multilevel level factors then influence the proximal antecedents of work design in terms of employee job crafting and managers’ job design behaviours by impacting on their knowledge, skills, abilities, motivation and opportunities. Research on how employees change their job designs by crafting their work is expanding rapidly (Rudolph, Katz, Lavigne, & Zacher, 2017), and an initial experiment investigating the role of managers in the design of work indicated that people tend to design poor quality jobs unless they have experience as an organizational psychologist, work in high autonomous jobs, or are generally open to new experiences (Parker, Andrei & Van den Broeck, 2018). In this symposium, our goal is to take this work forward by further investigating how the multilevel distal antecedents of work design influence employee job crafting and managers’ job design behaviors and also directly affect work design. The included papers highlight novel antecedents of work design at different levels which are currently under-researched but which could have important implications for research and practice. We hope to stimulate conversation on the topic which helps to take this field forward in a timely manner. 2020 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80744 10.5465/AMBPP.2020.18276symposium restricted
spellingShingle Knight, Caroline
Van den Broeck, Anja
Tims, Maria
Gawke, Jason
Parker, Sharon
Scrimpshire, Alex
Wang, Cynthia
Edwards, Bryan
Ku, Gillian
Sarmah, Pallavi
Proost, Karin
Germeys, Filip
Man, Yin
Berkers, Hannah
Rispens, Sonja
Le Blanc, Pascale
Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design
title Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design
title_full Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design
title_fullStr Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design
title_full_unstemmed Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design
title_short Multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design
title_sort multilevel perspectives on the antecedents of work design
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80744