The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units

Aim: Targeted temperature management (TTM) in post-resuscitation care has changed dramatically over the last two decades. However, uptake across Australian and New Zealand (NZ) intensive care units (ICUs) is unclear. We aimed to describe post-resuscitation care in our region, with a focus on TTM, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bray, Janet, Cartledge, Susie, Finn, Judith, Eastwood, Glenn, McKenzie, Nicole, Stub, Dion, Straney, Lahn, Bernard, Stephen
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2020
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80339
_version_ 1848764201957326848
author Bray, Janet
Cartledge, Susie
Finn, Judith
Eastwood, Glenn
McKenzie, Nicole
Stub, Dion
Straney, Lahn
Bernard, Stephen
author_facet Bray, Janet
Cartledge, Susie
Finn, Judith
Eastwood, Glenn
McKenzie, Nicole
Stub, Dion
Straney, Lahn
Bernard, Stephen
author_sort Bray, Janet
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: Targeted temperature management (TTM) in post-resuscitation care has changed dramatically over the last two decades. However, uptake across Australian and New Zealand (NZ) intensive care units (ICUs) is unclear. We aimed to describe post-resuscitation care in our region, with a focus on TTM, and to gain insights into clinician’s opinions about the level of evidence supporting TTM. Methods: In December 2017, we sent an online survey to 163 ICU medical directors in Australia (n ​= ​141) and NZ (n ​= ​22). Results: Sixty-one ICU medical directors responded (50 from Australia and 11 from NZ). Two respondents were excluded from analysis as their Private ICUs did not admit post-arrest patients. The majority of remaining respondents stated their ICU followed a post-resuscitation care clinical guideline (n ​= ​41/59, 70%). TTM was used in 57 (of 59, 97%) ICUs, of these only 64% had a specific TTM clinical guideline/policy and there was variation in the types of patients treated, temperatures targeted (range ​= ​33–37.5 ​°C), methods for cooling and duration of cooling (range ​= ​12–72 ​h). The majority of respondents stated that their ICU (n ​= ​45/57, 88%) changed TTM practice following the TTM trial: with 28% targeting temperatures >36 ​°C, and 23 (of 46, 50%) respondents expressed concerns with current level of evidence for TTM. Only 38% of post-resuscitation guidelines included prognostication procedures, few ICUs reported the use of electrophysiological tests. Conclusions: In Australian and New Zealand ICUs there is widespread variation in post-resuscitation care, including TTM practice and prognostication. There also seems to be concerns with current TTM evidence and recommendations.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:15:36Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-80339
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:15:36Z
publishDate 2020
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-803392020-08-21T03:08:41Z The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units Bray, Janet Cartledge, Susie Finn, Judith Eastwood, Glenn McKenzie, Nicole Stub, Dion Straney, Lahn Bernard, Stephen Aim: Targeted temperature management (TTM) in post-resuscitation care has changed dramatically over the last two decades. However, uptake across Australian and New Zealand (NZ) intensive care units (ICUs) is unclear. We aimed to describe post-resuscitation care in our region, with a focus on TTM, and to gain insights into clinician’s opinions about the level of evidence supporting TTM. Methods: In December 2017, we sent an online survey to 163 ICU medical directors in Australia (n ​= ​141) and NZ (n ​= ​22). Results: Sixty-one ICU medical directors responded (50 from Australia and 11 from NZ). Two respondents were excluded from analysis as their Private ICUs did not admit post-arrest patients. The majority of remaining respondents stated their ICU followed a post-resuscitation care clinical guideline (n ​= ​41/59, 70%). TTM was used in 57 (of 59, 97%) ICUs, of these only 64% had a specific TTM clinical guideline/policy and there was variation in the types of patients treated, temperatures targeted (range ​= ​33–37.5 ​°C), methods for cooling and duration of cooling (range ​= ​12–72 ​h). The majority of respondents stated that their ICU (n ​= ​45/57, 88%) changed TTM practice following the TTM trial: with 28% targeting temperatures >36 ​°C, and 23 (of 46, 50%) respondents expressed concerns with current level of evidence for TTM. Only 38% of post-resuscitation guidelines included prognostication procedures, few ICUs reported the use of electrophysiological tests. Conclusions: In Australian and New Zealand ICUs there is widespread variation in post-resuscitation care, including TTM practice and prognostication. There also seems to be concerns with current TTM evidence and recommendations. 2020 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80339 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100002 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ fulltext
spellingShingle Bray, Janet
Cartledge, Susie
Finn, Judith
Eastwood, Glenn
McKenzie, Nicole
Stub, Dion
Straney, Lahn
Bernard, Stephen
The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
title The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
title_full The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
title_fullStr The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
title_short The current temperature: A survey of post-resuscitation care across Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
title_sort current temperature: a survey of post-resuscitation care across australian and new zealand intensive care units
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80339