What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis

© 2019 Soh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction Measuring patient reported ou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soh, S.E., Barker, A.L., Ayton, D.R., Ahern, S., Morello, R., Lefkovits, J., Brennan, A.L., Evans, S., Zalcberg, J.R., Reid, Christopher, McNeil, J.J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80055
_version_ 1848764150733340672
author Soh, S.E.
Barker, A.L.
Ayton, D.R.
Ahern, S.
Morello, R.
Lefkovits, J.
Brennan, A.L.
Evans, S.
Zalcberg, J.R.
Reid, Christopher
McNeil, J.J.
author_facet Soh, S.E.
Barker, A.L.
Ayton, D.R.
Ahern, S.
Morello, R.
Lefkovits, J.
Brennan, A.L.
Evans, S.
Zalcberg, J.R.
Reid, Christopher
McNeil, J.J.
author_sort Soh, S.E.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2019 Soh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction Measuring patient reported outcomes can improve the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interventions. The aim of this study was to identify the final set of items that can be included in a patient-reported outcome measure to assess recovery of patients following percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods A consecutive sample of 200 patients registered in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry participated in a telephone survey 30 days following their percutaneous cardiac procedure. Rasch analysis was used to select the best set of items to form a concise and psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome measure. Key measurement properties assessed included overall fit to the Rasch measurement model, unidimensionality, response formats (thresholds), targeting, internal consistency and measurement invariance. Results Five items were identified as being reliable and valid measures of patient-reported outcomes: pain or discomfort, shortness of breath, confidence in performing usual activities, feeling unhappy and having trouble sleeping. Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning (χ2 16.99; p = 0.07) and all items demonstrated unidimensionality (t-test less than 0.05 threshold value). Internal consistency was acceptable (equivalent Cronbach’s α 0.65) given there are only five items, but there was a ceiling effect (mean logit score -1.24) with compromised score precision for patients with better recovery. Conclusions We identified a succinct set of items that can be used in a patient-reported outcome measure following percutaneous coronary interventions. This patient-report outcome measure has good structural validity and acceptable internal consistency. While further psychometric evaluations are recommended, the items identified capture the patient’s perspective of their recovery following a percutaneous coronary intervention.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:14:47Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-80055
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:14:47Z
publishDate 2019
publisher PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-800552021-01-05T08:07:08Z What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis Soh, S.E. Barker, A.L. Ayton, D.R. Ahern, S. Morello, R. Lefkovits, J. Brennan, A.L. Evans, S. Zalcberg, J.R. Reid, Christopher McNeil, J.J. Science & Technology Multidisciplinary Sciences Science & Technology - Other Topics MEASUREMENT MODEL QUALITY QUESTIONNAIRE VALIDATION DISEASE BURDEN © 2019 Soh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction Measuring patient reported outcomes can improve the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interventions. The aim of this study was to identify the final set of items that can be included in a patient-reported outcome measure to assess recovery of patients following percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods A consecutive sample of 200 patients registered in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry participated in a telephone survey 30 days following their percutaneous cardiac procedure. Rasch analysis was used to select the best set of items to form a concise and psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome measure. Key measurement properties assessed included overall fit to the Rasch measurement model, unidimensionality, response formats (thresholds), targeting, internal consistency and measurement invariance. Results Five items were identified as being reliable and valid measures of patient-reported outcomes: pain or discomfort, shortness of breath, confidence in performing usual activities, feeling unhappy and having trouble sleeping. Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning (χ2 16.99; p = 0.07) and all items demonstrated unidimensionality (t-test less than 0.05 threshold value). Internal consistency was acceptable (equivalent Cronbach’s α 0.65) given there are only five items, but there was a ceiling effect (mean logit score -1.24) with compromised score precision for patients with better recovery. Conclusions We identified a succinct set of items that can be used in a patient-reported outcome measure following percutaneous coronary interventions. This patient-report outcome measure has good structural validity and acceptable internal consistency. While further psychometric evaluations are recommended, the items identified capture the patient’s perspective of their recovery following a percutaneous coronary intervention. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80055 10.1371/journal.pone.0222185 English http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE fulltext
spellingShingle Science & Technology
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Science & Technology - Other Topics
MEASUREMENT MODEL
QUALITY
QUESTIONNAIRE
VALIDATION
DISEASE
BURDEN
Soh, S.E.
Barker, A.L.
Ayton, D.R.
Ahern, S.
Morello, R.
Lefkovits, J.
Brennan, A.L.
Evans, S.
Zalcberg, J.R.
Reid, Christopher
McNeil, J.J.
What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_full What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_fullStr What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_full_unstemmed What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_short What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_sort what matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? a new patient-reported outcome measure developed using rasch analysis
topic Science & Technology
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Science & Technology - Other Topics
MEASUREMENT MODEL
QUALITY
QUESTIONNAIRE
VALIDATION
DISEASE
BURDEN
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80055