A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury

The law has long been concerned with limiting recovery for pure psychiatric injury in negligence in order to prevent liability to plaintiffs who are unusually susceptible to this type of injury. The justifications provided by the courts for this concern have often centred on the idea that holding a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Allcock, Martin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Thomson Reuters 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80012
_version_ 1848764141543620608
author Allcock, Martin
author_facet Allcock, Martin
author_sort Allcock, Martin
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The law has long been concerned with limiting recovery for pure psychiatric injury in negligence in order to prevent liability to plaintiffs who are unusually susceptible to this type of injury. The justifications provided by the courts for this concern have often centred on the idea that holding a defendant liable to such a plaintiff will be unreasonable. However, there is a gap in the reasoning justifications for measuring the reasonableness of the defendant's conduct against the effect of that conduct on the hypothetical person of an "ordinary level of susceptibility". This article attempts to address this gap, arguing that measuring the reasonableness of the defendant's conduct in this way in relation to an overriding test of reasonable foreseeability can be explained pursuant to Allan Beever's corrective justice theory of negligence.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:14:38Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-80012
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:14:38Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Thomson Reuters
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-800122020-10-22T05:12:15Z A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury Allcock, Martin 1801 - Law The law has long been concerned with limiting recovery for pure psychiatric injury in negligence in order to prevent liability to plaintiffs who are unusually susceptible to this type of injury. The justifications provided by the courts for this concern have often centred on the idea that holding a defendant liable to such a plaintiff will be unreasonable. However, there is a gap in the reasoning justifications for measuring the reasonableness of the defendant's conduct against the effect of that conduct on the hypothetical person of an "ordinary level of susceptibility". This article attempts to address this gap, arguing that measuring the reasonableness of the defendant's conduct in this way in relation to an overriding test of reasonable foreseeability can be explained pursuant to Allan Beever's corrective justice theory of negligence. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80012 English Thomson Reuters restricted
spellingShingle 1801 - Law
Allcock, Martin
A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury
title A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury
title_full A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury
title_fullStr A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury
title_full_unstemmed A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury
title_short A Corrective Justice Justification for Considering the Response of the Hypothetical Person of an ‘Ordinary Level of Susceptibility’ when Assessing Reasonable Foreseeability in Case Involving Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury
title_sort corrective justice justification for considering the response of the hypothetical person of an ‘ordinary level of susceptibility’ when assessing reasonable foreseeability in case involving negligently inflicted psychiatric injury
topic 1801 - Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80012