Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants

A growing body of literature suggests that alterations in brain structure and function are a feature of chronic back pain. Tactile acuity is considered a clinical signature of primary somatosensory representation and offers a simple measure of cortical reorganisation. Clinical interpretation of test...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wand, B.M., Catley, M.J., Luomajoki, H.A., O'Sullivan, K.J., Harrington, Flavia, O'Connell, N.E., Moseley, G.L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/571090
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79570
_version_ 1848764076683952128
author Wand, B.M.
Catley, M.J.
Luomajoki, H.A.
O'Sullivan, K.J.
Harrington, Flavia
O'Connell, N.E.
Moseley, G.L.
author_facet Wand, B.M.
Catley, M.J.
Luomajoki, H.A.
O'Sullivan, K.J.
Harrington, Flavia
O'Connell, N.E.
Moseley, G.L.
author_sort Wand, B.M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description A growing body of literature suggests that alterations in brain structure and function are a feature of chronic back pain. Tactile acuity is considered a clinical signature of primary somatosensory representation and offers a simple measure of cortical reorganisation. Clinical interpretation of test scores from an individual patient is hampered by variance in published normative values and less than ideal inter-rater reliability. These problems might be mitigated in people with unilateral back pain by using the patient as their own control and comparing tactile acuity at the painful site to performance at the corresponding position on the non-painful side. The first step in exploring this approach is to quantify the normal side-to-side difference in healthy populations. We pooled data from three previous studies that measured lumbar tactile acuity bilaterally in healthy controls using similar protocols. We calculated the mean and variance of the absolute error between sides, the standard error of measurement and the reliable change index (RCI). The mean difference between sides was 3.2mm (±5.2) when assessed vertically and 1.9mm (±3.2) when assessed horizontally. The standard error of measurement was 4.2mm when assessed vertically and 2.7mm when assessed horizontally. The RCI suggests that differences of greater than 13mm when assessed horizontally and 17mm when assessed vertically equate to 95% confidence that a difference truly exists. Several assumptions related to the application of this approach need to be investigated further.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:13:36Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-79570
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:13:36Z
publishDate 2014
publisher CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-795702020-09-02T05:22:38Z Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants Wand, B.M. Catley, M.J. Luomajoki, H.A. O'Sullivan, K.J. Harrington, Flavia O'Connell, N.E. Moseley, G.L. Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Rehabilitation Chronic low back pain Two-point discrimination Sensory acuity Body image LOW-BACK-PAIN NONPAINFUL STIMULI DISCRIMINATION REORGANIZATION A growing body of literature suggests that alterations in brain structure and function are a feature of chronic back pain. Tactile acuity is considered a clinical signature of primary somatosensory representation and offers a simple measure of cortical reorganisation. Clinical interpretation of test scores from an individual patient is hampered by variance in published normative values and less than ideal inter-rater reliability. These problems might be mitigated in people with unilateral back pain by using the patient as their own control and comparing tactile acuity at the painful site to performance at the corresponding position on the non-painful side. The first step in exploring this approach is to quantify the normal side-to-side difference in healthy populations. We pooled data from three previous studies that measured lumbar tactile acuity bilaterally in healthy controls using similar protocols. We calculated the mean and variance of the absolute error between sides, the standard error of measurement and the reliable change index (RCI). The mean difference between sides was 3.2mm (±5.2) when assessed vertically and 1.9mm (±3.2) when assessed horizontally. The standard error of measurement was 4.2mm when assessed vertically and 2.7mm when assessed horizontally. The RCI suggests that differences of greater than 13mm when assessed horizontally and 17mm when assessed vertically equate to 95% confidence that a difference truly exists. Several assumptions related to the application of this approach need to be investigated further. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79570 10.1016/j.math.2014.01.002 English http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/571090 CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE restricted
spellingShingle Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Rehabilitation
Chronic low back pain
Two-point discrimination
Sensory acuity
Body image
LOW-BACK-PAIN
NONPAINFUL STIMULI
DISCRIMINATION
REORGANIZATION
Wand, B.M.
Catley, M.J.
Luomajoki, H.A.
O'Sullivan, K.J.
Harrington, Flavia
O'Connell, N.E.
Moseley, G.L.
Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants
title Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants
title_full Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants
title_fullStr Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants
title_full_unstemmed Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants
title_short Lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants
title_sort lumbar tactile acuity is near identical between sides in healthy pain-free participants
topic Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Rehabilitation
Chronic low back pain
Two-point discrimination
Sensory acuity
Body image
LOW-BACK-PAIN
NONPAINFUL STIMULI
DISCRIMINATION
REORGANIZATION
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/571090
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79570