Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire
Background. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is used by physical therapists in clinical practice and in research. However, current understanding of the PSEQ's measurement properties is incomplete, and investigators cannot be confident that it provides unbiased information on patient...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79569 |
| _version_ | 1848764076439633920 |
|---|---|
| author | Di Pietro, Flavia Catley, M.J. McAuley, J.H. Parkitny, L. Maher, C.G. Da Costa, L.C.M. Macedo, L.G. Williams, C.M. Moseley, G.L. |
| author_facet | Di Pietro, Flavia Catley, M.J. McAuley, J.H. Parkitny, L. Maher, C.G. Da Costa, L.C.M. Macedo, L.G. Williams, C.M. Moseley, G.L. |
| author_sort | Di Pietro, Flavia |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Background. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is used by physical therapists in clinical practice and in research. However, current understanding of the PSEQ's measurement properties is incomplete, and investigators cannot be confident that it provides unbiased information on patient self-efficacy. Objective. The aims of this study were: (1) to investigate the scale properties of the PSEQ using Rasch analysis and (2) to determine whether age, sex, pain intensity, pain duration, and pain-related disability bias function of the PSEQ. Design. This was a retrospective study; data were obtained from 3 existing studies. Methods. Data were combined from more than 600 patients with low back pain of varying duration. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate targeting, category ordering, unidimensionality, person fit, internal consistency, and item bias. Results. There was evidence of adequate category ordering, unidimensionality, and internal consistency of the PSEQ. Importantly, there was no evidence of item bias. Limitations. The PSEQ did not adequately target the sample; instead, it targeted people with lower self-efficacy than this population. Item 7 was hardest for participants to endorse, showing excessive positive misfit to the Rasch model. Response strings of misfitting persons revealed older participants and those reporting high levels of disability. Conclusions. The individual items of the PSEQ can be validly summed to provide a score of self-efficacy that is robust to age, sex, pain intensity, pain duration, and disability. Although item 7 is the most problematic, it may provide important clinical information and requires further investigation before its exclusion. Although the PSEQ is commonly used with people with low back pain, of whom the sample in this study was representative, the results suggest it targets patients with lower self-efficacy than that observed in the current sample. © 2014 American Physical Therapy Association. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:13:36Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-79569 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:13:36Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-795692020-09-02T05:23:58Z Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire Di Pietro, Flavia Catley, M.J. McAuley, J.H. Parkitny, L. Maher, C.G. Da Costa, L.C.M. Macedo, L.G. Williams, C.M. Moseley, G.L. Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Orthopedics Rehabilitation LOW-BACK-PAIN DISABILITY VALIDATION BELIEFS SCALES MODEL Background. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is used by physical therapists in clinical practice and in research. However, current understanding of the PSEQ's measurement properties is incomplete, and investigators cannot be confident that it provides unbiased information on patient self-efficacy. Objective. The aims of this study were: (1) to investigate the scale properties of the PSEQ using Rasch analysis and (2) to determine whether age, sex, pain intensity, pain duration, and pain-related disability bias function of the PSEQ. Design. This was a retrospective study; data were obtained from 3 existing studies. Methods. Data were combined from more than 600 patients with low back pain of varying duration. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate targeting, category ordering, unidimensionality, person fit, internal consistency, and item bias. Results. There was evidence of adequate category ordering, unidimensionality, and internal consistency of the PSEQ. Importantly, there was no evidence of item bias. Limitations. The PSEQ did not adequately target the sample; instead, it targeted people with lower self-efficacy than this population. Item 7 was hardest for participants to endorse, showing excessive positive misfit to the Rasch model. Response strings of misfitting persons revealed older participants and those reporting high levels of disability. Conclusions. The individual items of the PSEQ can be validly summed to provide a score of self-efficacy that is robust to age, sex, pain intensity, pain duration, and disability. Although item 7 is the most problematic, it may provide important clinical information and requires further investigation before its exclusion. Although the PSEQ is commonly used with people with low back pain, of whom the sample in this study was representative, the results suggest it targets patients with lower self-efficacy than that observed in the current sample. © 2014 American Physical Therapy Association. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79569 10.2522/ptj.20130217 English OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC restricted |
| spellingShingle | Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Orthopedics Rehabilitation LOW-BACK-PAIN DISABILITY VALIDATION BELIEFS SCALES MODEL Di Pietro, Flavia Catley, M.J. McAuley, J.H. Parkitny, L. Maher, C.G. Da Costa, L.C.M. Macedo, L.G. Williams, C.M. Moseley, G.L. Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire |
| title | Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire |
| title_full | Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire |
| title_fullStr | Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire |
| title_short | Rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire |
| title_sort | rasch analysis supports the use of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire |
| topic | Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Orthopedics Rehabilitation LOW-BACK-PAIN DISABILITY VALIDATION BELIEFS SCALES MODEL |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79569 |