A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ho, K.M., Dobb, G.J., Knuiman, M., Finn, Judith, Lee, K.Y., Webb, S.A.R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: BIOMED CENTRAL LTD 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79453
_version_ 1848764053655126016
author Ho, K.M.
Dobb, G.J.
Knuiman, M.
Finn, Judith
Lee, K.Y.
Webb, S.A.R.
author_facet Ho, K.M.
Dobb, G.J.
Knuiman, M.
Finn, Judith
Lee, K.Y.
Webb, S.A.R.
author_sort Ho, K.M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Introduction: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU. The collection of physiological data on admission only is probably logistically easier, and this approach is used by some ICUs. This study compares the performance of APACHE II scores calculated using admission data with those obtained from the worst values in the first 24 hours. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from a tertiary ICU. There were no missing physiological data and follow-up for mortality was available for all patients in the database. The admission and the worst 24-hour physiological variables were used to generate the admission APACHE II score and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score, and the corresponding predicted mortality, respectively. Results: There were 11,107 noncardiac surgery ICU admissions during 11 years from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2003. The mean admission and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score were 12.7 and 15.4, and the derived predicted mortality estimates were 15.5% and 19.3%, respectively. The actual hospital mortality was 16.3%. The overall discrimination ability, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of the admission APACHE II model (83.8%, 95% confidence interval = 82.9-84.7) and the worst 24-hour APACHE II model (84.6%, 95% confidence interval = 83.7-85.5) was not significantly different (P = 1.00). Conclusion: Substitution of the worst 24-hour physiological variables with the admission physiological variables to calculate the admission APACHE II score maintains the overall discrimination ability of the traditional APACHE II model. The admission APACHE II model represents a potential alternative model to the worst 24-hour APACHE II model in critically ill nontrauma patients. © 2005 Ho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:13:14Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-79453
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:13:14Z
publishDate 2005
publisher BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-794532020-05-27T07:04:54Z A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study Ho, K.M. Dobb, G.J. Knuiman, M. Finn, Judith Lee, K.Y. Webb, S.A.R. Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Critical Care Medicine General & Internal Medicine INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT APACHE-II SCORING SYSTEMS SEVERITY MODELS MULTICENTER PERFORMANCE DATABASE ADULTS Introduction: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU. The collection of physiological data on admission only is probably logistically easier, and this approach is used by some ICUs. This study compares the performance of APACHE II scores calculated using admission data with those obtained from the worst values in the first 24 hours. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from a tertiary ICU. There were no missing physiological data and follow-up for mortality was available for all patients in the database. The admission and the worst 24-hour physiological variables were used to generate the admission APACHE II score and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score, and the corresponding predicted mortality, respectively. Results: There were 11,107 noncardiac surgery ICU admissions during 11 years from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2003. The mean admission and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score were 12.7 and 15.4, and the derived predicted mortality estimates were 15.5% and 19.3%, respectively. The actual hospital mortality was 16.3%. The overall discrimination ability, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of the admission APACHE II model (83.8%, 95% confidence interval = 82.9-84.7) and the worst 24-hour APACHE II model (84.6%, 95% confidence interval = 83.7-85.5) was not significantly different (P = 1.00). Conclusion: Substitution of the worst 24-hour physiological variables with the admission physiological variables to calculate the admission APACHE II score maintains the overall discrimination ability of the traditional APACHE II model. The admission APACHE II model represents a potential alternative model to the worst 24-hour APACHE II model in critically ill nontrauma patients. © 2005 Ho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79453 10.1186/cc3913 English http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 BIOMED CENTRAL LTD fulltext
spellingShingle Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT
APACHE-II
SCORING SYSTEMS
SEVERITY
MODELS
MULTICENTER
PERFORMANCE
DATABASE
ADULTS
Ho, K.M.
Dobb, G.J.
Knuiman, M.
Finn, Judith
Lee, K.Y.
Webb, S.A.R.
A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
title A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
title_full A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
title_short A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparison of admission and worst 24-hour acute physiology and chronic health evaluation ii scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
topic Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT
APACHE-II
SCORING SYSTEMS
SEVERITY
MODELS
MULTICENTER
PERFORMANCE
DATABASE
ADULTS
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79453