“Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm

Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear-relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear-relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luck, Camilla, Patterson, Rachel R., Lipp, Ottmar
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: WILEY 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/SR120300015
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79229
_version_ 1848764016141271040
author Luck, Camilla
Patterson, Rachel R.
Lipp, Ottmar
author_facet Luck, Camilla
Patterson, Rachel R.
Lipp, Ottmar
author_sort Luck, Camilla
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear-relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear-relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear-irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear-relevance is manipulated between-groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear-relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within-participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear-relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio-cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:12:39Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-79229
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:12:39Z
publishDate 2020
publisher WILEY
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-792292021-01-06T00:38:34Z “Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm Luck, Camilla Patterson, Rachel R. Lipp, Ottmar Social Sciences Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Psychology, Biological Neurosciences Physiology Psychology Psychology, Experimental Neurosciences & Neurology electrodermal responding fear conditioning instructed extinction ontogenetic fear-relevant phylogenetic fear-relevant preparedness theory ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSES RELEVANT STIMULI PHOBIAS RESISTANCE ACQUISITION WINDOWS Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear-relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear-relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear-irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear-relevance is manipulated between-groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear-relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within-participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear-relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio-cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects. 2020 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79229 10.1111/psyp.13516 English http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/SR120300015 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP180100869 WILEY fulltext
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Psychology, Biological
Neurosciences
Physiology
Psychology
Psychology, Experimental
Neurosciences & Neurology
electrodermal responding
fear conditioning
instructed extinction
ontogenetic fear-relevant
phylogenetic fear-relevant
preparedness theory
ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSES
RELEVANT STIMULI
PHOBIAS
RESISTANCE
ACQUISITION
WINDOWS
Luck, Camilla
Patterson, Rachel R.
Lipp, Ottmar
“Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
title “Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
title_full “Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
title_fullStr “Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
title_full_unstemmed “Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
title_short “Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
title_sort “prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
topic Social Sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Psychology, Biological
Neurosciences
Physiology
Psychology
Psychology, Experimental
Neurosciences & Neurology
electrodermal responding
fear conditioning
instructed extinction
ontogenetic fear-relevant
phylogenetic fear-relevant
preparedness theory
ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSES
RELEVANT STIMULI
PHOBIAS
RESISTANCE
ACQUISITION
WINDOWS
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/SR120300015
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/SR120300015
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79229