Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer?

One of the issues examined at the Tax Forum that was held in Canberra in October 2011 was whether there are better ways that institutional arrangements for the tax system can be used to improve taxpayers' experiences of the tax system. The Assistant Treasurer acknowledged during a speech he gav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pinto, Dale
Format: Journal Article
Published: Taxation Institute of Australia 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7847
_version_ 1848745487318908928
author Pinto, Dale
author_facet Pinto, Dale
author_sort Pinto, Dale
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description One of the issues examined at the Tax Forum that was held in Canberra in October 2011 was whether there are better ways that institutional arrangements for the tax system can be used to improve taxpayers' experiences of the tax system. The Assistant Treasurer acknowledged during a speech he gave at the Forum that the Australian Taxation Office ('ATO') is considered a 'world leader' in tax administration but went on to state that it was crucial that the ATO as the keystone of the tax system can continue to meet the challenges of the tax system now and into the future. It is in this context that he proceeded to announce that it was the Government's belief that a Tax System Advisory Board ('Advisory Board') could add value to the administration of the tax system and enhance the reputation of the ATO as a world leading administration. This paper analyses whether the proposed Advisory Board could provide the answer to strengthening the ATO's existing governance framework. It will undertake this analysis in four parts. Part one of the paper will explain the background to the Advisory Board proposal which provides the necessary context for the ensuing discussion and analysis. Part two will examine the current governance framework of the ATO, including a discussion of possible limitations of this framework. This will be followed by an examination of the case for reform in part three of the paper which will include a review of the national and international literature related to governance arrangements for tax administrations. Part four will then draw some conclusions.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:18:08Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-7847
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:18:08Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Taxation Institute of Australia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-78472017-01-30T11:02:57Z Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer? Pinto, Dale One of the issues examined at the Tax Forum that was held in Canberra in October 2011 was whether there are better ways that institutional arrangements for the tax system can be used to improve taxpayers' experiences of the tax system. The Assistant Treasurer acknowledged during a speech he gave at the Forum that the Australian Taxation Office ('ATO') is considered a 'world leader' in tax administration but went on to state that it was crucial that the ATO as the keystone of the tax system can continue to meet the challenges of the tax system now and into the future. It is in this context that he proceeded to announce that it was the Government's belief that a Tax System Advisory Board ('Advisory Board') could add value to the administration of the tax system and enhance the reputation of the ATO as a world leading administration. This paper analyses whether the proposed Advisory Board could provide the answer to strengthening the ATO's existing governance framework. It will undertake this analysis in four parts. Part one of the paper will explain the background to the Advisory Board proposal which provides the necessary context for the ensuing discussion and analysis. Part two will examine the current governance framework of the ATO, including a discussion of possible limitations of this framework. This will be followed by an examination of the case for reform in part three of the paper which will include a review of the national and international literature related to governance arrangements for tax administrations. Part four will then draw some conclusions. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7847 Taxation Institute of Australia restricted
spellingShingle Pinto, Dale
Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer?
title Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer?
title_full Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer?
title_fullStr Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer?
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer?
title_short Strengthening the ATO's Existing Governance Framework - Is the Proposed Tax System Advisory Board the Answer?
title_sort strengthening the ato's existing governance framework - is the proposed tax system advisory board the answer?
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7847