Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective?

Since 2014, Curtin University Library has provided support to researchers in using the University’s in-house Data Management Planning (DMP) tool. The tool guides researchers through a series of questions on how they plan to collect, store, secure, and share their research data. Creation of the pl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Green, Peter, Cairns, Amy, White, Hollie
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2019
Online Access:https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2019/fair/3
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/77695
_version_ 1848763897119506432
author Green, Peter
Cairns, Amy
White, Hollie
author_facet Green, Peter
Cairns, Amy
White, Hollie
author_sort Green, Peter
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Since 2014, Curtin University Library has provided support to researchers in using the University’s in-house Data Management Planning (DMP) tool. The tool guides researchers through a series of questions on how they plan to collect, store, secure, and share their research data. Creation of the plan is a prerequisite for staff to obtain ethics approval and file storage. Uptake of the DMP has been excellent over that four years, but are the plans good and are they effective? In 2018, Curtin University Library chose to collaborate with a Masters by Coursework student, Amy Cairns, to undertake a study to analyse the quality and effectiveness of Research Data Management Plans. The core research question was whether Curtin’s DMP tool help researchers manage the data they collect. The study involved analysing the extensive dataset of four years of DMPs, and conducting a survey and focus groups with research staff who had used the DMP tool. The past DMP data provided useful information on which Faculties produced the most DMPs, how many had been updated, storage options, and peak times for creating DMPs. The survey and focus groups provided valuable feedback on whether the existence of a DMP had improved researcher practices. These activities asked researchers to consider why they completed a DMP, what prompted any updates of the DMP, and if the questions in the DMP had changed practices in how they organised data, stored it, and made it available. These findings will inform how the Library educates users in use of the Tool and refine other aspects of the research data management service. The practitioner-researcher collaboration between the Library and the research student was mutually beneficial, and we will continue to explore opportunities for similar arrangements in other service areas.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:10:45Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-77695
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:10:45Z
publishDate 2019
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-776952020-04-22T07:58:31Z Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective? Green, Peter Cairns, Amy White, Hollie Since 2014, Curtin University Library has provided support to researchers in using the University’s in-house Data Management Planning (DMP) tool. The tool guides researchers through a series of questions on how they plan to collect, store, secure, and share their research data. Creation of the plan is a prerequisite for staff to obtain ethics approval and file storage. Uptake of the DMP has been excellent over that four years, but are the plans good and are they effective? In 2018, Curtin University Library chose to collaborate with a Masters by Coursework student, Amy Cairns, to undertake a study to analyse the quality and effectiveness of Research Data Management Plans. The core research question was whether Curtin’s DMP tool help researchers manage the data they collect. The study involved analysing the extensive dataset of four years of DMPs, and conducting a survey and focus groups with research staff who had used the DMP tool. The past DMP data provided useful information on which Faculties produced the most DMPs, how many had been updated, storage options, and peak times for creating DMPs. The survey and focus groups provided valuable feedback on whether the existence of a DMP had improved researcher practices. These activities asked researchers to consider why they completed a DMP, what prompted any updates of the DMP, and if the questions in the DMP had changed practices in how they organised data, stored it, and made it available. These findings will inform how the Library educates users in use of the Tool and refine other aspects of the research data management service. The practitioner-researcher collaboration between the Library and the research student was mutually beneficial, and we will continue to explore opportunities for similar arrangements in other service areas. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/77695 https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2019/fair/3 unknown
spellingShingle Green, Peter
Cairns, Amy
White, Hollie
Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective?
title Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective?
title_full Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective?
title_fullStr Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective?
title_short Evaluating Data Management Plans: Are They Good and Are They Effective?
title_sort evaluating data management plans: are they good and are they effective?
url https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2019/fair/3
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/77695