The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective

Purpose: Work design is the content, responsibilities and relationships involved in work. Research suggests work characteristics co-occur, with important effects on work outcomes. We investigate the structure and function of different work design profiles of Australian Not-For-Profit (NFP) employees...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Knight, Caroline, Parker, sharon, McLarnon, Matt, Wenzel, Ramon
Format: Conference Paper
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/75898
_version_ 1848763578301022208
author Knight, Caroline
Parker, sharon
McLarnon, Matt
Wenzel, Ramon
author_facet Knight, Caroline
Parker, sharon
McLarnon, Matt
Wenzel, Ramon
author_sort Knight, Caroline
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: Work design is the content, responsibilities and relationships involved in work. Research suggests work characteristics co-occur, with important effects on work outcomes. We investigate the structure and function of different work design profiles of Australian Not-For-Profit (NFP) employees and identify predictors and outcomes to inform theory and future interventions. Methodology: Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) explored the dataset (N=2434). Established measures of autonomy, social support, relational characteristics (e.g. task significance, social impact) and job demands were used. Recommended fit indices tested for increasing numbers of profiles and explanatory and predictive validity. Results: Four distinct profiles emerged: 1) ‘High strain’ (low autonomy, support, relational characteristics); 2) ‘Low autonomy’ (low autonomy, average support and relational characteristics, higher demands); 3) ‘Average’; and 4) ‘Active’ (autonomy, support, relational characteristics above average, demands moderate). Managers were more likely to have ‘active’ jobs and experience better health and performance. Those with ‘low autonomy’ jobs outperformed those in ‘high strain’ jobs. Limitations: The dataset is cross-sectional. Longitudinal data is being collected to improve predictive and explanatory validity. Research / Practical implications: Relational characteristics may buffer the negative effects of low autonomy and high demands. Our results inform the development of person-centered work design theory and help target employees who would benefit most from improved work design. Value: Few studies have investigated the work design profiles of employees, with mixed results. None have included relational characteristics, yet research suggests these are particularly important for positive work outcomes in service industries.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:05:41Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-75898
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:05:41Z
publishDate 2019
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-758982019-07-09T23:29:21Z The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective Knight, Caroline Parker, sharon McLarnon, Matt Wenzel, Ramon Purpose: Work design is the content, responsibilities and relationships involved in work. Research suggests work characteristics co-occur, with important effects on work outcomes. We investigate the structure and function of different work design profiles of Australian Not-For-Profit (NFP) employees and identify predictors and outcomes to inform theory and future interventions. Methodology: Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) explored the dataset (N=2434). Established measures of autonomy, social support, relational characteristics (e.g. task significance, social impact) and job demands were used. Recommended fit indices tested for increasing numbers of profiles and explanatory and predictive validity. Results: Four distinct profiles emerged: 1) ‘High strain’ (low autonomy, support, relational characteristics); 2) ‘Low autonomy’ (low autonomy, average support and relational characteristics, higher demands); 3) ‘Average’; and 4) ‘Active’ (autonomy, support, relational characteristics above average, demands moderate). Managers were more likely to have ‘active’ jobs and experience better health and performance. Those with ‘low autonomy’ jobs outperformed those in ‘high strain’ jobs. Limitations: The dataset is cross-sectional. Longitudinal data is being collected to improve predictive and explanatory validity. Research / Practical implications: Relational characteristics may buffer the negative effects of low autonomy and high demands. Our results inform the development of person-centered work design theory and help target employees who would benefit most from improved work design. Value: Few studies have investigated the work design profiles of employees, with mixed results. None have included relational characteristics, yet research suggests these are particularly important for positive work outcomes in service industries. 2019 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/75898 restricted
spellingShingle Knight, Caroline
Parker, sharon
McLarnon, Matt
Wenzel, Ramon
The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective
title The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective
title_full The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective
title_fullStr The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective
title_full_unstemmed The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective
title_short The work design profiles of employees in the Australian Not-For-Profit sector: A person-centered perspective
title_sort work design profiles of employees in the australian not-for-profit sector: a person-centered perspective
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/75898