Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream

Copyright © 2018 by Emerald Publishing Limited. This chapter elaborates on the usefulness of embracing complexity theory modeling outcomes rather than directionality, and modeling complex rather than simple outcomes in strategic management. Complexity theory includes the tenet that most antecedent c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Woodside, Arch, Nagy, G., Megehee, C.
Format: Book
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74556
_version_ 1848763308492980224
author Woodside, Arch
Nagy, G.
Megehee, C.
author_facet Woodside, Arch
Nagy, G.
Megehee, C.
author_sort Woodside, Arch
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Copyright © 2018 by Emerald Publishing Limited. This chapter elaborates on the usefulness of embracing complexity theory modeling outcomes rather than directionality, and modeling complex rather than simple outcomes in strategic management. Complexity theory includes the tenet that most antecedent conditions are neither sufficient nor necessary for the occurrence of a specific outcome. Identifying a firm by individual antecedents (i.e., noninnovative vs. highly innovative, small vs. large size in sales or number of employees, or serving local vs. international markets) provides shallow information in modeling specific outcomes (e.g., high sales growth or high profitability)-even if directional analyses (e.g., regression analysis, including structural equation modeling) indicate that the independent (main) effects of the individual antecedents relate to outcomes directionally-because firm (case) anomalies almost always occur to main effects. Examples: A number of highly innovative firms have low sales while others have high sales and a number of noninnovative firms have low sales while others have high sales. Breaking-away from the current dominant logic of directionality testing-null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)-to embrace somewhat precise outcome testing (SPOT) is necessary for extracting highly useful information about the causes of anomalies-associations opposite to expected and "statistically significant"main effects. The study of anomalies extends to identifying the occurrences of four-corner strategy outcomes: Firms doing well in favorable circumstances, firms doing badly in favorable circumstances, firms doing well in unfavorable circumstances, and firms doing badly in unfavorable circumstances. Models of four-corner strategy outcomes advance strategic management beyond the current dominant logic of directional modeling of single outcomes.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:01:24Z
format Book
id curtin-20.500.11937-74556
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:01:24Z
publishDate 2018
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-745562019-02-19T05:36:19Z Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream Woodside, Arch Nagy, G. Megehee, C. Copyright © 2018 by Emerald Publishing Limited. This chapter elaborates on the usefulness of embracing complexity theory modeling outcomes rather than directionality, and modeling complex rather than simple outcomes in strategic management. Complexity theory includes the tenet that most antecedent conditions are neither sufficient nor necessary for the occurrence of a specific outcome. Identifying a firm by individual antecedents (i.e., noninnovative vs. highly innovative, small vs. large size in sales or number of employees, or serving local vs. international markets) provides shallow information in modeling specific outcomes (e.g., high sales growth or high profitability)-even if directional analyses (e.g., regression analysis, including structural equation modeling) indicate that the independent (main) effects of the individual antecedents relate to outcomes directionally-because firm (case) anomalies almost always occur to main effects. Examples: A number of highly innovative firms have low sales while others have high sales and a number of noninnovative firms have low sales while others have high sales. Breaking-away from the current dominant logic of directionality testing-null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)-to embrace somewhat precise outcome testing (SPOT) is necessary for extracting highly useful information about the causes of anomalies-associations opposite to expected and "statistically significant"main effects. The study of anomalies extends to identifying the occurrences of four-corner strategy outcomes: Firms doing well in favorable circumstances, firms doing badly in favorable circumstances, firms doing well in unfavorable circumstances, and firms doing badly in unfavorable circumstances. Models of four-corner strategy outcomes advance strategic management beyond the current dominant logic of directional modeling of single outcomes. 2018 Book http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74556 10.1108/S1069-096420180000025005 restricted
spellingShingle Woodside, Arch
Nagy, G.
Megehee, C.
Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream
title Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream
title_full Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream
title_fullStr Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream
title_full_unstemmed Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream
title_short Four-corner outcomes in strategic management: Successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream
title_sort four-corner outcomes in strategic management: successful and unsuccessful paddling down versus upstream
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74556