Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour
This paper will explore both the ways in which the practices of self-care, specifically related to mental health, have emerged as responses to the increasingly precarious status of life after the economic shocks of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), whilst also looking to the work of Silvia Federici...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
University of Technology, Sydney - ePress
2018
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74551 |
| _version_ | 1848763306934796288 |
|---|---|
| author | Russell, Francis |
| author_facet | Russell, Francis |
| author_sort | Russell, Francis |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This paper will explore both the ways in which the practices of self-care, specifically related to mental health, have emerged as responses to the increasingly precarious status of life after the economic shocks of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), whilst also looking to the work of Silvia Federici and Kathi Weeks to propose models for immanent critique of these practices. Although it cannot be taken as a pure origin, post-GFC mental health discourse has increasingly seen mental health discussed as a form of resilience to precarity. Furthermore, practices of self-care, and psychological forms of treatment such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) have become vehicles for the intensification of personal resilience in the face of systemic crisis. If self-care involves an inward looking and depoliticised subject, surely political emancipation lies elsewhere. The possibility of some alternative to our present state of affairs, where self-care increasingly appears as a form of ‘voluntary servitude,’ that is to say, a form of self-subjugation with serious political risks, must surely be taken as a continual project for those engaged in critical inquiry. Then again, to suggest that those engaging in self-care are simply reproducing neoliberal subjectivity would surely miss the ways in which such forms of self-preservation might appear as unavoidable for the individuals in question. Through an engagement with their work—and one that draws parallels between their strategic critiques of reproductive labour broadly speaking, and the more specific area of mental illness and neoliberal governmentality—the question of the “necessity” of self-care will be brought into alignment with the possibilities of its practicality. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:01:22Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-74551 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:01:22Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | University of Technology, Sydney - ePress |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-745512019-08-07T01:32:22Z Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour Russell, Francis This paper will explore both the ways in which the practices of self-care, specifically related to mental health, have emerged as responses to the increasingly precarious status of life after the economic shocks of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), whilst also looking to the work of Silvia Federici and Kathi Weeks to propose models for immanent critique of these practices. Although it cannot be taken as a pure origin, post-GFC mental health discourse has increasingly seen mental health discussed as a form of resilience to precarity. Furthermore, practices of self-care, and psychological forms of treatment such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) have become vehicles for the intensification of personal resilience in the face of systemic crisis. If self-care involves an inward looking and depoliticised subject, surely political emancipation lies elsewhere. The possibility of some alternative to our present state of affairs, where self-care increasingly appears as a form of ‘voluntary servitude,’ that is to say, a form of self-subjugation with serious political risks, must surely be taken as a continual project for those engaged in critical inquiry. Then again, to suggest that those engaging in self-care are simply reproducing neoliberal subjectivity would surely miss the ways in which such forms of self-preservation might appear as unavoidable for the individuals in question. Through an engagement with their work—and one that draws parallels between their strategic critiques of reproductive labour broadly speaking, and the more specific area of mental illness and neoliberal governmentality—the question of the “necessity” of self-care will be brought into alignment with the possibilities of its practicality. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74551 10.5130/csr.v24i2.5582 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ University of Technology, Sydney - ePress fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Russell, Francis Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour |
| title | Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour |
| title_full | Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour |
| title_fullStr | Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour |
| title_full_unstemmed | Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour |
| title_short | Wages for Self-Care: Mental Illness and Reproductive Labour |
| title_sort | wages for self-care: mental illness and reproductive labour |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74551 |