The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting

Sequestering organic carbon (C) in soil can help to combat land degradation, improve food security, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. But we need reliable, cost-efficient methods to assess, monitor, and verify the change. Here, we compared two methods for the direct measureme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viscarra Rossel, Raphael, Brus, D.
Format: Journal Article
Published: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74381
_version_ 1848763259018018816
author Viscarra Rossel, Raphael
Brus, D.
author_facet Viscarra Rossel, Raphael
Brus, D.
author_sort Viscarra Rossel, Raphael
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Sequestering organic carbon (C) in soil can help to combat land degradation, improve food security, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. But we need reliable, cost-efficient methods to assess, monitor, and verify the change. Here, we compared two methods for the direct measurement of soil organic C stocks and for monitoring the change. Our aims were to quantify the soil organic C stock in two carbon estimation areas, under cropping and grazing, using composite sampling with two designs and proximal sensing. We compared the two schemes in terms of the (a) accuracy of the estimated C stocks, the total cost, and the cost-efficiency, calculated as the ratio of the accuracy of the estimate and the total cost, and (b) uncertainty of the estimated standard error of the estimated C stocks. We found that compositing was cheaper but more inaccurate than sensing. Sensing was 1.2 to 2.1 times more cost-efficient than compositing. We also found that the uncertainty of the estimated standard errors from compositing was large and unreliable, which can hinder the quantification of a minimum detectable difference in organic C stocks. We show that the sensor-derived spatially explicit data can also be used to map the C stocks, which can help to optimise the sampling design in subsequent monitoring rounds. Our findings have important implications for the development of C measurement and monitoring methodologies. Visible–near infrared and gamma attenuation sensing can accurately, cost-efficiently, and reliably monitor and verify changes in soil C stocks.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:00:37Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-74381
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:00:37Z
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-743812019-08-15T05:06:01Z The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting Viscarra Rossel, Raphael Brus, D. Sequestering organic carbon (C) in soil can help to combat land degradation, improve food security, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. But we need reliable, cost-efficient methods to assess, monitor, and verify the change. Here, we compared two methods for the direct measurement of soil organic C stocks and for monitoring the change. Our aims were to quantify the soil organic C stock in two carbon estimation areas, under cropping and grazing, using composite sampling with two designs and proximal sensing. We compared the two schemes in terms of the (a) accuracy of the estimated C stocks, the total cost, and the cost-efficiency, calculated as the ratio of the accuracy of the estimate and the total cost, and (b) uncertainty of the estimated standard error of the estimated C stocks. We found that compositing was cheaper but more inaccurate than sensing. Sensing was 1.2 to 2.1 times more cost-efficient than compositing. We also found that the uncertainty of the estimated standard errors from compositing was large and unreliable, which can hinder the quantification of a minimum detectable difference in organic C stocks. We show that the sensor-derived spatially explicit data can also be used to map the C stocks, which can help to optimise the sampling design in subsequent monitoring rounds. Our findings have important implications for the development of C measurement and monitoring methodologies. Visible–near infrared and gamma attenuation sensing can accurately, cost-efficiently, and reliably monitor and verify changes in soil C stocks. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74381 10.1002/ldr.2887 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle Viscarra Rossel, Raphael
Brus, D.
The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting
title The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting
title_full The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting
title_fullStr The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting
title_full_unstemmed The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting
title_short The cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic C accounting
title_sort cost-efficiency and reliability of two methods for soil organic c accounting
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74381