Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous

© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. Background: Beliefs can be assessed using explicit measures (e.g. questionnaires) that rely on information of which the person is ‘aware’ and willing to disclose. Conversely, implicit measures evaluate beliefs using computer-based tasks that allow reduced time for introspection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caneiro, JP, O'Sullivan, Peter, Smith, Anne, Ovrebekk, Ingrid, Tozer, Luke, Williams, Michael, Teng, Magdalene Li Wen, Lipp, Ottmar
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74126
_version_ 1848763187373015040
author Caneiro, JP
O'Sullivan, Peter
Smith, Anne
Ovrebekk, Ingrid
Tozer, Luke
Williams, Michael
Teng, Magdalene Li Wen
Lipp, Ottmar
author_facet Caneiro, JP
O'Sullivan, Peter
Smith, Anne
Ovrebekk, Ingrid
Tozer, Luke
Williams, Michael
Teng, Magdalene Li Wen
Lipp, Ottmar
author_sort Caneiro, JP
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. Background: Beliefs can be assessed using explicit measures (e.g. questionnaires) that rely on information of which the person is ‘aware’ and willing to disclose. Conversely, implicit measures evaluate beliefs using computer-based tasks that allow reduced time for introspection thus reflecting ‘automatic’ associations. Thus far, physiotherapists’ beliefs about back posture and safety have not been evaluated with implicit measures. Objectives: (1) Evaluate implicit associations between bending lifting back posture (straight-back vs round-back) and safety (safe vs danger); (2) Explore correlations between implicit and explicit measures of beliefs towards vulnerability of the back. Design: Exploratory cross-sectional quantitative study. Methods: 47 musculoskeletal physiotherapists completed explicit measures of fear of movement (TSK-HC), back beliefs (BackPAQDanger) and beliefs related to bending and lifting back posture and safety (BSB). An Implicit Association Test (IAT) was used to assess implicit associations between (i) images of people bending/lifting with a ‘round-back’ or with a ‘straight-back’ posture, and (ii) words representing ‘safety’ and ‘danger’. A one-sample t-test assessed the degree and direction of the sample's IAT score. Cohen's d provided an effect size of the estimated bias. Correlation between IAT and each explicit measure was assessed using Pearson's coefficient. Results: The sample displayed an implicit association between ‘round-back’ and ‘danger’ (µ = 0.213, 95% CI [0.075-0.350], p =.003), with an effect size magnitude of 0.45. There were fair to moderate correlations between IAT and BSB (r = 0.320, 95% CI [0.036-0.556], p =.029) and, IAT and BackPAQDanger (r = 0.413, 95%CI [0.143-0.626], p =.004). Conclusions: Physiotherapists displayed an implicit bias towards bending and lifting with a round-back as dangerous.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:59:28Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-74126
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:59:28Z
publishDate 2019
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-741262019-05-09T08:12:05Z Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous Caneiro, JP O'Sullivan, Peter Smith, Anne Ovrebekk, Ingrid Tozer, Luke Williams, Michael Teng, Magdalene Li Wen Lipp, Ottmar © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. Background: Beliefs can be assessed using explicit measures (e.g. questionnaires) that rely on information of which the person is ‘aware’ and willing to disclose. Conversely, implicit measures evaluate beliefs using computer-based tasks that allow reduced time for introspection thus reflecting ‘automatic’ associations. Thus far, physiotherapists’ beliefs about back posture and safety have not been evaluated with implicit measures. Objectives: (1) Evaluate implicit associations between bending lifting back posture (straight-back vs round-back) and safety (safe vs danger); (2) Explore correlations between implicit and explicit measures of beliefs towards vulnerability of the back. Design: Exploratory cross-sectional quantitative study. Methods: 47 musculoskeletal physiotherapists completed explicit measures of fear of movement (TSK-HC), back beliefs (BackPAQDanger) and beliefs related to bending and lifting back posture and safety (BSB). An Implicit Association Test (IAT) was used to assess implicit associations between (i) images of people bending/lifting with a ‘round-back’ or with a ‘straight-back’ posture, and (ii) words representing ‘safety’ and ‘danger’. A one-sample t-test assessed the degree and direction of the sample's IAT score. Cohen's d provided an effect size of the estimated bias. Correlation between IAT and each explicit measure was assessed using Pearson's coefficient. Results: The sample displayed an implicit association between ‘round-back’ and ‘danger’ (µ = 0.213, 95% CI [0.075-0.350], p =.003), with an effect size magnitude of 0.45. There were fair to moderate correlations between IAT and BSB (r = 0.320, 95% CI [0.036-0.556], p =.029) and, IAT and BackPAQDanger (r = 0.413, 95%CI [0.143-0.626], p =.004). Conclusions: Physiotherapists displayed an implicit bias towards bending and lifting with a round-back as dangerous. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74126 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.12.002 fulltext
spellingShingle Caneiro, JP
O'Sullivan, Peter
Smith, Anne
Ovrebekk, Ingrid
Tozer, Luke
Williams, Michael
Teng, Magdalene Li Wen
Lipp, Ottmar
Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous
title Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous
title_full Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous
title_fullStr Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous
title_full_unstemmed Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous
title_short Physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous
title_sort physiotherapists implicitly evaluate bending and lifting with a round back as dangerous
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74126