Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension

We compared the predictive validity of two types of Frame-of-Reference personality measures to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Each version of the measures used a unique response-format referred to as frequency-based estimation that allowed the behavioral consistency of responses to be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robie, C., Risavy, S., Holtrop, Djurre, Born, M.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/73963
_version_ 1848763144170635264
author Robie, C.
Risavy, S.
Holtrop, Djurre
Born, M.
author_facet Robie, C.
Risavy, S.
Holtrop, Djurre
Born, M.
author_sort Robie, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description We compared the predictive validity of two types of Frame-of-Reference personality measures to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Each version of the measures used a unique response-format referred to as frequency-based estimation that allowed the behavioral consistency of responses to be gauged. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with “at school”, and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. Results showed that completely contextualized measures were the most predictively valid and, contrary to our expectations, behavioral consistency did not moderate the relationships. Face validity and to a lesser extent perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. We discuss the implications of our results for personality assessment in applied settings.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:58:47Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-73963
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:58:47Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-739632019-07-12T06:01:14Z Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension Robie, C. Risavy, S. Holtrop, Djurre Born, M. We compared the predictive validity of two types of Frame-of-Reference personality measures to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Each version of the measures used a unique response-format referred to as frequency-based estimation that allowed the behavioral consistency of responses to be gauged. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with “at school”, and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. Results showed that completely contextualized measures were the most predictively valid and, contrary to our expectations, behavioral consistency did not moderate the relationships. Face validity and to a lesser extent perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. We discuss the implications of our results for personality assessment in applied settings. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/73963 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.05.005 Elsevier restricted
spellingShingle Robie, C.
Risavy, S.
Holtrop, Djurre
Born, M.
Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension
title Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension
title_full Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension
title_fullStr Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension
title_full_unstemmed Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension
title_short Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension
title_sort fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: a replication and extension
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/73963