Take-home naloxone and the politics of care

QR Code

Take-home naloxone and the politics of care

'Take-home naloxone' refers to a life-saving intervention in which a drug (naloxone) is made available to nonmedically trained people for administration to other people experiencing an opioid overdose. In Australia, it has not been taken up as widely as would be expected, given its life-sa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Farrugia, Adrian, Fraser, Suzanne, Dwyer, R., Fomiatti, Renae, Neale, J., Dietze, P., Strang, J.
Format:	Journal Article
Published:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2018
Online Access:	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/73924

Similar Items

Assembling the Social and Political Dimensions of Take-Home Naloxone
by: Farrugia, A., et al.
Published: (2017)

Benefits and barriers to expanding the availability of take-home naloxone in Australia: A qualitative interview study with service providers
by: Dwyer, Robyn, et al.
Published: (2016)

An overview of take-home naloxone programs in Australia
by: Dwyer, Robyn, et al.
Published: (2018)

Knowledge of naloxone and take-home naloxone programs among a sample of people who inject drugs in Australia
by: Dietze, P., et al.
Published: (2015)

EVIDENCE FOR TAKE-HOME NALOXONE PROGRAMS: A BRADFORD HILL ANALYSIS
by: Olsen, A., et al.
Published: (2014)

Interpellating recovery: The politics of 'identity' in recovery-focused treatment
by: Fomiatti, Renae, et al.
Published: (2017)

Does training people to administer take-home naloxone increase their knowledge? Evidence from Australian programs
by: Dietze, P., et al.
Published: (2018)

Knowledge of naloxone and take-home naloxone programs among a sample of people who inject drugs in Australia: Variations across capital cities
by: Dietze, P., et al.
Published: (2018)

Assessing causality in drug policy analyses: How useful are the Bradford Hill criteria in analysing take-home naloxone programs?
by: Olsen, A., et al.
Published: (2017)

Findings and lessons learnt from implementing Australia's first health service based take-home naloxone program
by: Chronister, K., et al.
Published: (2016)

Editorial: Now is the time to take steps to allow peer access to naloxone for heroin overdose in Australia
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2009)

The improvable self: enacting model citizenship and sociality in research on ‘new recovery’
by: Fomiatti, Renae, et al.
Published: (2018)

Acceptability of prison-based take-home naloxone programmes among a cohort of incarcerated men with a history of regular injecting drug use
by: Curtis, M., et al.
Published: (2018)

Developing a single-session strategy for the implementation of take-home naloxone by community pharmacists using COM-B and design-thinking
by: Moullin, Joanna, et al.
Published: (2023)

Australia reschedules naloxone for opioid overdose
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2016)

Grievable lives? Death by opioid overdose in Australian newspaper coverage
by: Fraser, Suzanne, et al.
Published: (2018)

Materialising drugged pleasures: Practice, politics and care
by: Farrugia, Adrian, et al.
Published: (2017)

Commentary on Williams et al. (2014): Family matters—new resources for managing opioid overdose with take-home naloxone
by: Tait, Robert, et al.
Published: (2014)

Naloxone for administration by peers in cases of heroin overdose
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2009)

Evaluation of the WA Peer Naloxone Project- Final Report
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2016)

Hope, Choice and the Improvable Self: A Critical Analysis of ‘New Recovery’ in Australia
by: Fomiatti, Renae Dorothy
Published: (2017)

Explainer: what is naloxone and how can it help save drug users who overdose?
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2015)

EXPANDING THE AVAILABILITY OF NALOXONE IN AUSTRALIA: REVIEWING THE FIRST YEAR
by: Olsen, A., et al.
Published: (2013)

SYDNEY NALOXONE DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM - WHAT CLINICIANS AND CLIENTS THINK
by: Ivan, M., et al.
Published: (2012)

Producing “Progress” Through the Implementation of Outcome Monitoring in Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment
by: Savic, M., et al.
Published: (2016)

EVALUATING AUSTRALIA'S FIRST NALOXONE PROGRAMS: DEVELOPMENT, PROGRESS AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS
by: Dietze, P., et al.
Published: (2013)

Evaluation of the 'Implementing Expanded Naloxone Availability in the ACT (I-ENAACT) Program' 2011-2014
by: Olsen, A., et al.
Published: (2015)

Gender, reputation and regret: The ontological politics of Australian drug education.
by: Farrugia, Adrian
Published: (2016)

We must take care of nature to take care of ourselves
by: Ibrahim, Ahmad
Published: (2023)

Young brains at risk: Co-constituting youth and addiction in neuroscience-informed Australian drug education
by: Farrugia, A., et al.
Published: (2017)

Prehending Addiction: Alcohol and Other Drug Professionalsâ€™ Encounters With â€œNewâ€? Addictions
by: Farrugia, A., et al.
Published: (2017)

Science and scepticism: Drug information, young men and counterpublic health
by: Farrugia, A., et al.
Published: (2016)

Working together: Expanding the availability of naloxone for peer administration to prevent opioid overdose deaths in the Australian Capital Territory and beyond
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2014)

How justify is my take home pay?
by: Nwanesi Peter, Karubi, et al.
Published: (2011)

Injecting buprenorphine-naloxone film: Findings from an explorative qualitative study
by: White, N., et al.
Published: (2015)

Saudi Arabian Politics Takes on Machiavellian Nuance
by: Rich, Ben
Published: (2017)

Engendering drug problems: Materialising gender in the DUDIT and other screening and diagnostic â€˜apparatusesâ€™
by: Dwyer, Robyn, et al.
Published: (2017)

Celebrity enactments of addiction on Twitter
by: Dwyer, Robyn, et al.
Published: (2017)

Addiction screening and diagnostic tools: 'Refuting' and 'unmasking' claims to legitimacy
by: Dwyer, Robyn, et al.
Published: (2015)

Making addictions in standardised screening and diagnostic tools
by: Dwyer, Robyn, et al.
Published: (2016)